/pentest

Pentest

PTES-aligned adversarial security audit for backend, frontend, and mobile applications. Produces a CVSS-scored Hacker Report with verified PoCs and phased remediation.

**Input:** $ARGUMENTS

Optional args: slug=<feature>, ticket=<id/url>, mode=interactive|autonomous|channel, channel=<id>, auto_continue=true|false, profile=business|hybrid|technical.

Instructions

Execute the following steps for **$ARGUMENTS**.

🕵️‍♂️ Penetration Test (PTES-Aligned)

Goal: Execute a red-team assessment across backend, frontend, and mobile targets with verified PoCs and audit-grade evidence.

Steps

1. Scope and authorization:

• Determine mode (`whitebox`, `greybox`, `blackbox`) and targets.
• Verify explicit authorization; stop if unauthorized.

2. Intel and threat model:

• Identify stack, endpoints, parameters, local storage, schemes, and secrets.
• Use `common-security-audit`, `common-dast-tooling`, and architecture docs when available.
• Map trust boundaries, secrets, external integrations, and privileged workflows before exploit attempts.

3. Vulnerability analysis:

• Run scans and delegate: SAST/SCA to `specialist-aspm-correlator`, dynamic/logic to `specialist-logic-hacker`, binary/mobile to `specialist-mobile-reverser`.
• Rank targets by `exposure × sensitivity × auth_coverage`.

4. Exploit verification:

• **No Exploit = No Report.** Discard unverified findings.
• Build reproducible PoCs and record preconditions, payloads, evidence, and blast radius.

5. Reporting:

• Write `artifacts/security-review.md` with assumptions, source provenance, review context, runtime contract, PoCs, blast radius, finding confidence, exploit path, evidence gaps, and handoff notes.
• Emit `artifacts/security-review.dev.md`, `artifacts/security-review.appsec.md`, or `artifacts/security-review.exec.md` only when leadership, client, or AppSec reporting is in scope.
• Score from 100: Critical -25 (cap 25), High -15 (cap 40), Medium -8, Low -3.
• Reuse the existing `security-review.md` record when pentest follows earlier design or PR security review work.
• Deliver findings in the standard template below.

Output Template

Executive Summary

• **Hacker Score**: X/100 ([Critical/Vulnerable/Moderate/Hardened])
• **Target Scope**: [repos, URLs, mobile apps]
• **Findings**: [Critical/High/Medium/Low counts]

Findings Table

| ID | Title | Platform | Severity | CVSS | CWE | PoC | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | SEC-01 | [title] | [backend\|frontend\|mobile] | [Critical\|High\|Medium\|Low] | [score] | [CWE-id] | [Yes\|No] |