academic-research-comp…
Guide a research project through the full academic lifecycle — from raw idea to concrete research question, literature grounding, methodology, writing,…
StateRAMP expert for state and local government cloud services. Deep knowledge of State Risk and Authorization Management Program including Low/Moderate impact levels, NIST 800-53 controls, state-specific requirements, FedRAMP alignment, and multi-state authorization strategies.
$ npx -y skills add GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering --skill stateramp-expert --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/stateramp-expertContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
StateRAMP expert for state and local government cloud services. Deep knowledge of State Risk and Authorization Management Program including Low/Moderate impact levels, NIST 800-53 controls, state-specific requirements, FedRAMP alignment, and multi-state authorization strategies.
name: stateramp-expert description: StateRAMP expert for state and local government cloud services. Deep knowledge of State Risk and Authorization Management Program including Low/Moderate impact levels, NIST 800-53 controls, state-specific requirements, FedRAMP alignment, and multi-state authorization strategies. allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Write
Deep expertise in StateRAMP (State Risk and Authorization Management Program) for cloud service providers serving state and local government agencies.
**Purpose**: Standardized, reusable security authorization framework for state and local government cloud services **Authority**: State-level (not federal) **Based On**: FedRAMP framework, adapted for state/local needs **Launch**: 2015 (evolved from state reciprocity initiatives) **Current Status**: 15+ participating states, growing adoption
**Program Goals**:
| Aspect | StateRAMP | FedRAMP | |--------|-----------|---------| | **Authority** | State/local government | Federal government | | **Governance** | StateRAMP Impact Council | GSA, DHS, DOD (JAB) | | **Market** | 50 states, territories, localities | Federal agencies | | **Cost** | 20-30% lower typically | $200K-$1M+ | | **Timeline** | 6-18 months | 12-24+ months | | **Reciprocity** | Across participating states | Across federal agencies | | **Controls** | NIST 800-53 (state-tailored) | NIST 800-53 Rev 5 | | **Impact Levels** | Low, Moderate | Low, Moderate, High | | **Assessment** | StateRAMP-recognized 3PAO | FedRAMP-authorized 3PAO |
**Similarities**:
**Key Differences**:
StateRAMP uses FIPS 199 categorization:
**Low Impact (~125 controls)**:
**Moderate Impact (~325 controls)**:
**High Impact**:
StateRAMP uses NIST SP 800-53 control framework:
**18 Control Families**:
1. **Access Control (AC)** - 25 controls at Moderate
2. **Awareness and Training (AT)** - 5 controls
3. **Audit and Accountability (AU)** - 12 controls
4. **Security Assessment and Authorization (CA)** - 9 controls
5. **Configuration Management (CM)** - 11 controls
6. **Contingency Planning (CP)** - 10 controls
7. **Identification and Authentication (IA)** - 11 controls
8. **Incident Response (IR)** - 10 controls
9. **Maintenance (MA)** - 6 controls
Open-source GRC Engineering resource for Claude. claude-grc-engineering turns technical evidence from cloud, SaaS, code, and security tools into framework-aligned findings, gap reports, remediation guidance, evidence packages, and OSCAL workflows.
Repo: GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering
Guide a research project through the full academic lifecycle — from raw idea to concrete research question, literature grounding, methodology, writing,…
Expertise in evaluating AWS accounts for compliance — what checks are meaningful, which SCF controls they map to, and how to interpret aws CLI output.
Use when interpreting AWS Secrets Manager connector output, deciding between inspector and retrieve modes, drafting SCF-mapped controls for rotation / KMS /…
Expertise in evaluating Azure subscription findings from azure-inspector and mapping them to SCF controls.
Interpret CrowdStrike Falcon findings for sensor coverage, policy visibility, and host group scoping.
Interpret datadog-inspector findings and translate Datadog monitoring, audit, log-retention, SSO, and RBAC results into GRC evidence and remediation.