academic-research-comp…
Guide a research project through the full academic lifecycle — from raw idea to concrete research question, literature grounding, methodology, writing,…
Singapore - Personal Data Protection Ac (PDPA) (2012) expert. Reference-depth framework plugin with assessment, scope determination, and evidence checklist — backed by the SCF crosswalk. Level up to Full by adding framework-specific workflow commands.
$ npx -y skills add GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering --skill singapore-pdpa-expert --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/singapore-pdpa-expertContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Singapore - Personal Data Protection Ac (PDPA) (2012) expert. Reference-depth framework plugin with assessment, scope determination, and evidence checklist — backed by the SCF crosswalk. Level up to Full by adding framework-specific workflow commands.
name: singapore-pdpa-expert description: Singapore - Personal Data Protection Ac (PDPA) (2012) expert. Reference-depth framework plugin with assessment, scope determination, and evidence checklist — backed by the SCF crosswalk. Level up to Full by adding framework-specific workflow commands. allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Write
Reference-depth expertise for **Singapore - Personal Data Protection Ac (PDPA) (2012)**. This plugin bundles the SCF crosswalk (30 SCF controls → 14 framework controls) with framework-specific context.
TODO: add the following when filling in expertise. Reference depth expects all of these to have at least two-sentence answers.
TODO: one-paragraph summary of what Singapore - Personal Data Protection Ac (PDPA) (2012) exists to do and who it affects. Avoid verbatim regulation text — paraphrase and cite articles/sections by number.
TODO: who must comply, where operations must be happening, what the carve-outs are.
TODO: the named documents or registers the framework requires (e.g. GDPR's ROPA/DPIA, PCI DSS's ROC/SAQ, ISO 27001's Statement of Applicability). Stub if uncertain; a Full-depth PR can add commands to generate each.
TODO: notification windows (e.g. GDPR 72 hours), assessment frequency, recertification cycles.
TODO: who enforces, how penalties are calculated, recent enforcement patterns worth knowing.
TODO: overlaps with GDPR / ISO / NIST / sectoral rules. Reference the [cross-framework analyzer](../../../../grc-engineer/scripts/cross-framework-analyzer.js) outputs when useful.
TODO: at least 2–3 community-level misunderstandings this plugin should correct. Example: "ITAR only affects munitions" (it covers technical data too).
All three delegate to `/grc-engineer:gap-assessment` with SCF framework ID `apac-sgp-pdpa-2012` for the control-by-control mechanics, and wrap the results in Singapore - Personal Data Protection Ac (PDPA) (2012)-specific terminology.
Full-depth plugins add framework-specific workflow commands tied to the audit ritual. Candidates for this framework:
TODO: propose 2–4 framework-specific commands. Examples from existing Full-depth plugins:
Open-source GRC Engineering resource for Claude. claude-grc-engineering turns technical evidence from cloud, SaaS, code, and security tools into framework-aligned findings, gap reports, remediation guidance, evidence packages, and OSCAL workflows.
Repo: GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering
Guide a research project through the full academic lifecycle — from raw idea to concrete research question, literature grounding, methodology, writing,…
Expertise in evaluating AWS accounts for compliance — what checks are meaningful, which SCF controls they map to, and how to interpret aws CLI output.
Use when interpreting AWS Secrets Manager connector output, deciding between inspector and retrieve modes, drafting SCF-mapped controls for rotation / KMS /…
Expertise in evaluating Azure subscription findings from azure-inspector and mapping them to SCF controls.
Interpret CrowdStrike Falcon findings for sensor coverage, policy visibility, and host group scoping.
Interpret datadog-inspector findings and translate Datadog monitoring, audit, log-retention, SSO, and RBAC results into GRC evidence and remediation.