academic-research-comp…
Guide a research project through the full academic lifecycle — from raw idea to concrete research question, literature grounding,…
Verbatim reference for all 320 NIST 800-171A Rev 2 assessment objectives, plus the Rev 2 → Rev 3 control crosswalk. Use for AO-level lookups (e.g., 3.1.1[c]), evidence planning, and forward-mapping to Rev 3. Pairs with cmmc-expert.
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering --skill cmmc-assessment-objectives --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering --skill cmmc-assessment-objectives -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering --skill cmmc-assessment-objectives -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering --skill cmmc-assessment-objectives -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering --skill cmmc-assessment-objectives -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering --skill cmmc-assessment-objectives -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering --skill cmmc-assessment-objectives -a windsurf -y
name: cmmc-assessment-objectives description: "Source-based navigation for CMMC assessment objectives and revision transition; verify objective text and identifiers in official publications." allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Write
> **Review required:** This is an unverified working aid, not an authoritative assessment or legal determination. Verify objective wording, labels, applicability, scoring, and crosswalks in official sources and obtain qualified CMMC review. If a source or contract is unavailable, mark the conclusion unverified; do not infer compliance.
The previous local objective catalog and revision crosswalk have been removed because their exact wording, labels, and mappings were not verified. Do not reconstruct an exact catalog from memory or present this guide as a verbatim reference.
1. Check the solicitation or contract, assessment level and current program rules. Use [32 CFR 170.14](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-32/section-170.14), [170.15](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-32/section-170.15), [170.16](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-32/section-170.16), and [170.17](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-32/section-170.17) as appropriate. Level 1 mapping is specified separately; do not assume the Level 2 process applies unchanged. 2. Consult [NIST SP 800-171A (June 2018)](https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-171A) for assessment procedures and [NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2](https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-171r2) for requirement text where applicable. The NIST publication was withdrawn and superseded, but is incorporated by reference in the CMMC regulation; verify current incorporation and applicable edition. 3. Locate the precise requirement and copy only its source-verified determination statement and label. Some determination statements are lettered and others are not: 3.13.11 is unlettered in the June 2018 publication. Never invent a letter suffix. Record source, edition and location; if inaccessible, say the objective is unverified. 4. Identify appropriate examine, interview and test activities based on the source, assessment scope and evidence. These are potential methods, not a mandatory universal artifact list. Separate observations from decisions and avoid inventing evidence or certification outcomes. 5. For scoring and conditional status, check [32 CFR 170.24](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-32/section-170.24) and [32 CFR 170.21](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-32/section-170.21), including all restrictions. CA.L2-3.12.4 cannot be on a Level 2 POA&M; IA.L2-3.5.3 is subject to the point-value restrictions.
Use [NIST's CUI project resources](https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/protecting-controlled-unclassified-information) for revision comparison and verify individual mappings in NIST publications. A crosswalk is a planning aid, not proof that one revision satisfies another or that a requirement is met. Under Rev 2, 3.3.7 requires capability to compare and synchronize clocks with an authoritative source; it does not prescribe NTP. Do not change the contractually applicable edition based solely on a newer publication.
Open-source GRC Engineering resource for Claude. claude-grc-engineering turns technical evidence from cloud, SaaS, code, and security tools into framework-aligned findings, gap reports, remediation guidance, evidence packages, and OSCAL workflows.
Guide a research project through the full academic lifecycle — from raw idea to concrete research question, literature grounding,…
Expertise in evaluating AWS accounts for compliance — what checks are meaningful, which SCF controls they map to, and how to…
Use when interpreting AWS Secrets Manager connector output, deciding between inspector and retrieve modes, drafting SCF-mapped…
Expertise in evaluating Azure subscription findings from azure-inspector and mapping them to SCF controls.
Interpret CrowdStrike Falcon findings for sensor coverage, policy visibility, and host group scoping.
Interpret datadog-inspector findings and translate Datadog monitoring, audit, log-retention, SSO, and RBAC results into GRC…
Use for authorized security assessment of REST, GraphQL, WebSocket, or SOAP APIs, including discovery, authentication,…
Extract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys)…
Clean and finalize authorized natural-language text intended for readers by auditing suspicious invisible Unicode and rewriting…