/incident-reporting
Major ICT-related incident reporting process and requirements under DORA
$ npx -y skills add GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfClaude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/incident-reporting
Context preview
What this command does when you run it.
Major ICT-related incident reporting process and requirements under DORA
Command definition
incident-reporting.mddescription: Major ICT-related incident reporting process and requirements under DORA
DORA Incident Reporting
Provides comprehensive guidance on DORA's incident management and reporting requirements for major ICT-related incidents.
Arguments
- `$1` - Incident severity (required: major, non-major, cyber-threat)
- `$2` - Reporting stage (optional: initial, intermediate, final, update)
Incident Reporting Overview
**Legal Basis**: Articles 17-23 of DORA **Requirement**: Mandatory reporting of major incidents to national competent authorities **Timeline**: Strict deadlines (4 hours, 72 hours, 1 month) **Penalties**: Significant fines for non-compliance
Incident Classification
Major Incident Criteria (Article 18)
An ICT-related incident is classified as **major** if it meets one or more of these criteria:
1. Impact on Financial Services
**Threshold Indicators**:
- Critical or important functions affected
- Services unavailable or degraded
- Transaction processing disrupted
- Client access to accounts/services blocked
- Payment systems affected
**Examples**:
- Online banking unavailable for >2 hours
- Payment processing system down
- Trading platform outage during market hours
- ATM network failure affecting multiple locations
2. Client/Counterparty Impact
**Threshold Indicators**:
- Large number of clients affected (>10,000 for large entities, proportionate for smaller)
- High-value counterparties impacted
- Multiple member states affected
- Impact duration exceeds tolerance levels
**Examples**:
- Widespread account access issues
- Failed bulk payments affecting thousands
- Trading disruptions affecting multiple clients
- Data breach exposing client information
3. Duration of Impact
**Threshold Indicators**:
- Service unavailable exceeding RTO (Recovery Time Objective)
- Prolonged degradation of critical services
- Extended recovery time
- Multiple business days affected
**Typical Thresholds** (entity-specific):
- Critical services: >2-4 hours
- Important services: >4-8 hours
- Supporting services: >24 hours
4. Geographical Spread
**Threshold Indicators**:
- Incident affects operations in multiple EU member states
- Cross-border service disruption
- International clients impacted
- Widespread system failure
5. Data Loss or Corruption
**Threshold Indicators**:
- Loss of critical data affecting service delivery
- Data corruption preventing transaction processing
- Integrity of financial records compromised
- Personal data breach requiring GDPR notification
**Examples**:
- Transaction database corruption
- Customer account data loss
- Financial records integrity issues
- Backup systems compromised
6. Reputational Impact
**Threshold Indicators**:
- Significant media coverage
- Public confidence affected
- Regulatory scrutiny triggered
- Market impact on share price
**Examples**:
- Major cybersecurity breach publicized
- Extended service outage reported in media
- Data breach affecting thousands of clients
- Ransomware attack with public demands
7. Economic Impact
**Threshold Indicators**:
- Direct financial losses exceeding materiality thresholds
- Operational costs of incident response
- Regulatory fines or penalties
- Client compensation required
**Typical Thresholds**:
- Large institutions: >EUR 100,000
- Medium institutions: >EUR 50,000
- Small institutions: >EUR 10,000
- *(Proportionate to entity size and complexity)*
Non-Major Incidents
**Characteristics**:
- Limited impact on services
- Contained to single function/system
- Quick resolution (within tolerance)
- Minimal client impact
- No data loss or corruption
- No reputational damage
**Reporting**:
- Internal tracking and documentation required
- No mandatory reporting to authorities
- May aggregate for trend analysis
- Report if incident escalates to major
Cyber Threats (Article 20)
**Definition**:
- Potential cyber attack identified
- Vulnerability discovered that could be exploited
- Threat intelligence indicating targeting
- Reconnaissance or probing detected
**Reporting**:
- **Voluntary** notification to authorities
- Can share with other financial entities
- Liability protection for good faith sharing
- Helps collective defense
Incident Reporting Timeline
Initial Notification (4 Hours)
**Deadline**: Within 4 hours of detection and classification as major incident
**Required Information**:
- Date and time of incident detection
- Indication that incident is classified as major
- Preliminary description of incident
- Affected systems or services
- Initial assessment of impact
- Status of incident (ongoing, contained, resolved)
**Submission Method**:
- Via single point of contact to NCA
- Using standardized template (when available)
- Electronic submission preferred
**Key Point**: This is notification of awareness, not full analysis. Speed is critical.
Intermediate Report (72 Hours)
**Deadline**: Within 72 hours of initial notification
**Required Information**:
- Updated incident classification and justification
- Actual number of clients/users affected
- Actual duration of impact to date
- Geographical scope of incident
- Root cause analysis (preliminary or final)
- Technical details of incident:
- Attack vectors (if applicable)
- Vulnerabilities exploited
- Systems/services compromised
- Data affected
- Mitigation actions taken
- Recovery actions initiated
- Expected recovery timeline
- Whether incident is ongoing
- Estimated further impact
**Analysis Required**:
- More detailed impact assessment
- Initial root cause if identified
- Evidence of mitigation effectiveness
Final Report (1 Month)
**Deadline**: Within 1 month after initial notification (may be extended in complex cases)
**Required Information**:
- **Comprehensive Incident Description**:
- Full timeline of events
- Complete impact assessment
- Final client/service impact numbers
- Total duration of incident
-
Read more
description: Major ICT-related incident reporting process and requirements under DORA
DORA Incident Reporting
Provides comprehensive guidance on DORA's incident management and reporting requirements for major ICT-related incidents.
Arguments
- `$1` - Incident severity (required: major, non-major, cyber-threat)
- `$2` - Reporting stage (optional: initial, intermediate, final, update)
Incident Reporting Overview
**Legal Basis**: Articles 17-23 of DORA **Requirement**: Mandatory reporting of major incidents to national competent authorities **Timeline**: Strict deadlines (4 hours, 72 hours, 1 month) **Penalties**: Significant fines for non-compliance
Incident Classification
Major Incident Criteria (Article 18)
An ICT-related incident is classified as **major** if it meets one or more of these criteria:
1. Impact on Financial Services
**Threshold Indicators**:
- Critical or important functions affected
- Services unavailable or degraded
- Transaction processing disrupted
- Client access to accounts/services blocked
- Payment systems affected
**Examples**:
- Online banking unavailable for >2 hours
- Payment processing system down
- Trading platform outage during market hours
- ATM network failure affecting multiple locations
2. Client/Counterparty Impact
**Threshold Indicators**:
- Large number of clients affected (>10,000 for large entities, proportionate for smaller)
- High-value counterparties impacted
- Multiple member states affected
- Impact duration exceeds tolerance levels
**Examples**:
- Widespread account access issues
- Failed bulk payments affecting thousands
- Trading disruptions affecting multiple clients
- Data breach exposing client information
3. Duration of Impact
**Threshold Indicators**:
- Service unavailable exceeding RTO (Recovery Time Objective)
- Prolonged degradation of critical services
- Extended recovery time
- Multiple business days affected
**Typical Thresholds** (entity-specific):
- Critical services: >2-4 hours
- Important services: >4-8 hours
- Supporting services: >24 hours
4. Geographical Spread
**Threshold Indicators**:
- Incident affects operations in multiple EU member states
- Cross-border service disruption
- International clients impacted
- Widespread system failure
5. Data Loss or Corruption
**Threshold Indicators**:
- Loss of critical data affecting service delivery
- Data corruption preventing transaction processing
- Integrity of financial records compromised
- Personal data breach requiring GDPR notification
**Examples**:
- Transaction database corruption
- Customer account data loss
- Financial records integrity issues
- Backup systems compromised
6. Reputational Impact
**Threshold Indicators**:
- Significant media coverage
- Public confidence affected
- Regulatory scrutiny triggered
- Market impact on share price
**Examples**:
- Major cybersecurity breach publicized
- Extended service outage reported in media
- Data breach affecting thousands of clients
- Ransomware attack with public demands
7. Economic Impact
**Threshold Indicators**:
- Direct financial losses exceeding materiality thresholds
- Operational costs of incident response
- Regulatory fines or penalties
- Client compensation required
**Typical Thresholds**:
- Large institutions: >EUR 100,000
- Medium institutions: >EUR 50,000
- Small institutions: >EUR 10,000
- *(Proportionate to entity size and complexity)*
Non-Major Incidents
**Characteristics**:
- Limited impact on services
- Contained to single function/system
- Quick resolution (within tolerance)
- Minimal client impact
- No data loss or corruption
- No reputational damage
**Reporting**:
- Internal tracking and documentation required
- No mandatory reporting to authorities
- May aggregate for trend analysis
- Report if incident escalates to major
Cyber Threats (Article 20)
**Definition**:
- Potential cyber attack identified
- Vulnerability discovered that could be exploited
- Threat intelligence indicating targeting
- Reconnaissance or probing detected
**Reporting**:
- **Voluntary** notification to authorities
- Can share with other financial entities
- Liability protection for good faith sharing
- Helps collective defense
Incident Reporting Timeline
Initial Notification (4 Hours)
**Deadline**: Within 4 hours of detection and classification as major incident
**Required Information**:
- Date and time of incident detection
- Indication that incident is classified as major
- Preliminary description of incident
- Affected systems or services
- Initial assessment of impact
- Status of incident (ongoing, contained, resolved)
**Submission Method**:
- Via single point of contact to NCA
- Using standardized template (when available)
- Electronic submission preferred
**Key Point**: This is notification of awareness, not full analysis. Speed is critical.
Intermediate Report (72 Hours)
**Deadline**: Within 72 hours of initial notification
**Required Information**:
- Updated incident classification and justification
- Actual number of clients/users affected
- Actual duration of impact to date
- Geographical scope of incident
- Root cause analysis (preliminary or final)
- Technical details of incident:
- Attack vectors (if applicable)
- Vulnerabilities exploited
- Systems/services compromised
- Data affected
- Mitigation actions taken
- Recovery actions initiated
- Expected recovery timeline
- Whether incident is ongoing
- Estimated further impact
**Analysis Required**:
- More detailed impact assessment
- Initial root cause if identified
- Evidence of mitigation effectiveness
Final Report (1 Month)
**Deadline**: Within 1 month after initial notification (may be extended in complex cases)
**Required Information**:
- **Comprehensive Incident Description**:
- Full timeline of events
- Complete impact assessment
- Final client/service impact numbers
- Total duration of incident
-
Open-source GRC Engineering resource for Claude. claude-grc-engineering turns technical evidence from cloud, SaaS, code, and security tools into framework-aligned findings, gap reports, remediation guidance, evidence packages, and OSCAL workflows.
Repo: GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering
Other commands on trust-center.
- /research
Start or resume an academic research project — idea through literature, methodology, writing, feedback, and publishing
Open command - /collect
Query AWS for compliance-relevant configuration across IAM, S3, CloudTrail, EBS, and emit findings conforming to the v1 contract.
Open command - /setup
Install the frdocx-to-froscal-ssp Python pipeline and verify its dependencies. Idempotent.
Open command - /status
Check the deployment status of the trust center.
Open command - /scan
Run testssl.sh against one or more HTTPS endpoints and emit v1 Findings mapped to SOC 2, NIST 800-53, PCI DSS 4.0.1, ISO 27001, and SCF controls.
Open command - /compliance-posture
Serve a localhost compliance posture dashboard from monitor-continuous JSON
Open command

