/ig-select
Determine appropriate CIS Controls Implementation Group (IG1/IG2/IG3)
$ npx -y skills add GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfClaude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/ig-select
Context preview
What this command does when you run it.
Determine appropriate CIS Controls Implementation Group (IG1/IG2/IG3)
Command definition
ig-select.mddescription: Determine appropriate CIS Controls Implementation Group (IG1/IG2/IG3)
> _CIS Controls v8 content used under CC BY-SA 4.0 from the Center for Internet Security. This command's CIS-derived content is CC BY-SA 4.0. See [LICENSE-CIS.md](../LICENSE-CIS.md)._
CIS Controls IG Selection
Helps determine the appropriate Implementation Group (IG1, IG2, or IG3) for your organization based on size, resources, risk profile, and adversary sophistication.
Arguments
- `$1` - Organization size (optional: small, medium, large)
- `$2` - Risk profile (optional: low, moderate, high, critical)
Implementation Group Decision Framework
IG1 - Essential Cyber Hygiene (56 Safeguards)
**Recommended For**:
- Small to medium businesses (<100 employees)
- Limited IT security resources (1-2 IT staff, no dedicated security team)
- Standard business risk profile
- Not targeted by advanced persistent threats
- Limited regulatory compliance requirements
**Resource Requirements**:
- Part-time security focus (can be handled by IT staff)
- Basic security tools (antivirus, firewall, backup)
- Budget: $10K-$50K annually
- Minimal specialized expertise needed
**Threat Profile**:
- Opportunistic attacks (phishing, ransomware)
- Automated scanning/exploitation
- Commodity malware
- Script kiddies, unsophisticated attackers
**Example Organizations**:
- Local retailers
- Professional services firms
- Small healthcare practices
- Regional nonprofits
- Educational institutions (K-12)
IG2 - Enterprise Security (128 Safeguards)
**Recommended For**:
- Medium to large organizations (100-1,000 employees)
- Dedicated IT team with security responsibilities
- Moderate regulatory requirements (HIPAA, PCI-DSS, etc.)
- Handle sensitive customer or business data
- Potential target for more sophisticated attacks
**Resource Requirements**:
- Dedicated security staff (1-3 FTEs)
- Enterprise security tools (SIEM, EDR, vulnerability scanner)
- Budget: $100K-$500K annually
- Some specialized security expertise
**Threat Profile**:
- Targeted phishing campaigns
- Financially motivated cybercriminals
- Ransomware groups
- Industrial espionage
- Nation-state actors (lower tier)
**Example Organizations**:
- Mid-sized healthcare systems
- Financial services companies
- Manufacturing firms
- Regional government agencies
- SaaS providers
IG3 - Advanced Security (153 Safeguards)
**Recommended For**:
- Large enterprises (1,000+ employees)
- Critical infrastructure organizations
- High-value assets or intellectual property
- Stringent regulatory requirements (CMMC L3, critical infrastructure)
- Known targets of sophisticated adversaries
**Resource Requirements**:
- Security Operations Center (SOC) team (5+ FTEs)
- Advanced security tools (threat intelligence, behavioral analysis, SOAR)
- Budget: $1M+ annually
- Highly specialized security expertise (threat hunters, forensics, IR)
**Threat Profile**:
- Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs)
- Nation-state actors
- Sophisticated cybercriminal organizations
- Insider threats
- Supply chain attacks
**Example Organizations**:
- Fortune 500 companies
- Defense contractors
- Major healthcare systems
- Critical infrastructure (energy, utilities, transportation)
- Large financial institutions
Selection Criteria Matrix
| Factor | IG1 | IG2 | IG3 | |--------|-----|-----|-----| | **Employees** | <100 | 100-1,000 | 1,000+ | | **IT Staff** | 1-2 generalists | 3-10 with security focus | 10+ dedicated security | | **Annual Revenue** | <$10M | $10M-$1B | $1B+ | | **Data Sensitivity** | Basic business data | Customer PII, PHI | Trade secrets, critical infrastructure | | **Regulatory** | Minimal | Moderate (HIPAA, SOX) | High (CMMC, NERC CIP) | | **Threat Level** | Opportunistic | Targeted | Advanced/persistent | | **Security Budget** | <$50K | $100K-$500K | $1M+ | | **Downtime Tolerance** | Hours-days | Hours | Minutes |
Progressive Implementation Approach
Organizations should consider a phased approach:
**Phase 1**: Implement IG1 (Foundation)
- Timeline: 6-12 months
- Focus: Essential cyber hygiene
- Quick wins with high impact
**Phase 2**: Advance to IG2 (If needed)
- Timeline: 12-24 months
- Focus: Enterprise processes and automation
- Build on IG1 foundation
**Phase 3**: Advance to IG3 (If needed)
- Timeline: 24-36 months
- Focus: Advanced threat detection and response
- Mature security operations
Risk-Based Considerations
**High-Risk Factors** (may warrant higher IG):
- Handles sensitive data (PII, PHI, financial, IP)
- Critical infrastructure sector
- Known target of sophisticated threats
- High-profile or controversial organization
- Supply chain for critical industries
- Regulatory enforcement history
**Offsetting Factors** (may allow lower IG):
- Limited attack surface (air-gapped, isolated)
- Strong compensating controls
- Cyber insurance requirements met
- Managed security service provider (MSSP) support
- Cloud-native with strong CSP security
Industry Benchmarks
**Healthcare**:
- Small practices: IG1
- Mid-sized systems: IG2
- Large hospital networks: IG3
**Financial Services**:
- Credit unions: IG1-IG2
- Regional banks: IG2
- National banks: IG3
**Manufacturing**:
- Job shops: IG1
- Mid-market: IG2
- OEMs with IP: IG3
**Technology**:
- Startups: IG1
- Growth stage: IG2
- Enterprise SaaS: IG3
Output
1. **Recommended IG Level**: IG1, IG2, or IG3 2. **Justification**: Factors driving the recommendation 3. **Resource Requirements**: Estimated staff, budget, tools needed 4. **Safeguard Count**: How many controls to implement (56, 128, or 153) 5. **Implementation Timeline**: Realistic timeframe to reach target IG 6. **Cost-Benefit Analysis**: Security value vs implementation cost 7. **Progressive Path**: If starting lower, roadmap to advance IG levels
Examples
# Determine IG for small healthcare practice
/cis:ig-select small moderate
# Assess IG needs for large financial institution
/cis:ig-select large
Read more
description: Determine appropriate CIS Controls Implementation Group (IG1/IG2/IG3)
> _CIS Controls v8 content used under CC BY-SA 4.0 from the Center for Internet Security. This command's CIS-derived content is CC BY-SA 4.0. See [LICENSE-CIS.md](../LICENSE-CIS.md)._
CIS Controls IG Selection
Helps determine the appropriate Implementation Group (IG1, IG2, or IG3) for your organization based on size, resources, risk profile, and adversary sophistication.
Arguments
- `$1` - Organization size (optional: small, medium, large)
- `$2` - Risk profile (optional: low, moderate, high, critical)
Implementation Group Decision Framework
IG1 - Essential Cyber Hygiene (56 Safeguards)
**Recommended For**:
- Small to medium businesses (<100 employees)
- Limited IT security resources (1-2 IT staff, no dedicated security team)
- Standard business risk profile
- Not targeted by advanced persistent threats
- Limited regulatory compliance requirements
**Resource Requirements**:
- Part-time security focus (can be handled by IT staff)
- Basic security tools (antivirus, firewall, backup)
- Budget: $10K-$50K annually
- Minimal specialized expertise needed
**Threat Profile**:
- Opportunistic attacks (phishing, ransomware)
- Automated scanning/exploitation
- Commodity malware
- Script kiddies, unsophisticated attackers
**Example Organizations**:
- Local retailers
- Professional services firms
- Small healthcare practices
- Regional nonprofits
- Educational institutions (K-12)
IG2 - Enterprise Security (128 Safeguards)
**Recommended For**:
- Medium to large organizations (100-1,000 employees)
- Dedicated IT team with security responsibilities
- Moderate regulatory requirements (HIPAA, PCI-DSS, etc.)
- Handle sensitive customer or business data
- Potential target for more sophisticated attacks
**Resource Requirements**:
- Dedicated security staff (1-3 FTEs)
- Enterprise security tools (SIEM, EDR, vulnerability scanner)
- Budget: $100K-$500K annually
- Some specialized security expertise
**Threat Profile**:
- Targeted phishing campaigns
- Financially motivated cybercriminals
- Ransomware groups
- Industrial espionage
- Nation-state actors (lower tier)
**Example Organizations**:
- Mid-sized healthcare systems
- Financial services companies
- Manufacturing firms
- Regional government agencies
- SaaS providers
IG3 - Advanced Security (153 Safeguards)
**Recommended For**:
- Large enterprises (1,000+ employees)
- Critical infrastructure organizations
- High-value assets or intellectual property
- Stringent regulatory requirements (CMMC L3, critical infrastructure)
- Known targets of sophisticated adversaries
**Resource Requirements**:
- Security Operations Center (SOC) team (5+ FTEs)
- Advanced security tools (threat intelligence, behavioral analysis, SOAR)
- Budget: $1M+ annually
- Highly specialized security expertise (threat hunters, forensics, IR)
**Threat Profile**:
- Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs)
- Nation-state actors
- Sophisticated cybercriminal organizations
- Insider threats
- Supply chain attacks
**Example Organizations**:
- Fortune 500 companies
- Defense contractors
- Major healthcare systems
- Critical infrastructure (energy, utilities, transportation)
- Large financial institutions
Selection Criteria Matrix
| Factor | IG1 | IG2 | IG3 | |--------|-----|-----|-----| | **Employees** | <100 | 100-1,000 | 1,000+ | | **IT Staff** | 1-2 generalists | 3-10 with security focus | 10+ dedicated security | | **Annual Revenue** | <$10M | $10M-$1B | $1B+ | | **Data Sensitivity** | Basic business data | Customer PII, PHI | Trade secrets, critical infrastructure | | **Regulatory** | Minimal | Moderate (HIPAA, SOX) | High (CMMC, NERC CIP) | | **Threat Level** | Opportunistic | Targeted | Advanced/persistent | | **Security Budget** | <$50K | $100K-$500K | $1M+ | | **Downtime Tolerance** | Hours-days | Hours | Minutes |
Progressive Implementation Approach
Organizations should consider a phased approach:
**Phase 1**: Implement IG1 (Foundation)
- Timeline: 6-12 months
- Focus: Essential cyber hygiene
- Quick wins with high impact
**Phase 2**: Advance to IG2 (If needed)
- Timeline: 12-24 months
- Focus: Enterprise processes and automation
- Build on IG1 foundation
**Phase 3**: Advance to IG3 (If needed)
- Timeline: 24-36 months
- Focus: Advanced threat detection and response
- Mature security operations
Risk-Based Considerations
**High-Risk Factors** (may warrant higher IG):
- Handles sensitive data (PII, PHI, financial, IP)
- Critical infrastructure sector
- Known target of sophisticated threats
- High-profile or controversial organization
- Supply chain for critical industries
- Regulatory enforcement history
**Offsetting Factors** (may allow lower IG):
- Limited attack surface (air-gapped, isolated)
- Strong compensating controls
- Cyber insurance requirements met
- Managed security service provider (MSSP) support
- Cloud-native with strong CSP security
Industry Benchmarks
**Healthcare**:
- Small practices: IG1
- Mid-sized systems: IG2
- Large hospital networks: IG3
**Financial Services**:
- Credit unions: IG1-IG2
- Regional banks: IG2
- National banks: IG3
**Manufacturing**:
- Job shops: IG1
- Mid-market: IG2
- OEMs with IP: IG3
**Technology**:
- Startups: IG1
- Growth stage: IG2
- Enterprise SaaS: IG3
Output
1. **Recommended IG Level**: IG1, IG2, or IG3 2. **Justification**: Factors driving the recommendation 3. **Resource Requirements**: Estimated staff, budget, tools needed 4. **Safeguard Count**: How many controls to implement (56, 128, or 153) 5. **Implementation Timeline**: Realistic timeframe to reach target IG 6. **Cost-Benefit Analysis**: Security value vs implementation cost 7. **Progressive Path**: If starting lower, roadmap to advance IG levels
Examples
# Determine IG for small healthcare practice /cis:ig-select small moderate # Assess IG needs for large financial institution /cis:ig-select large
Open-source GRC Engineering resource for Claude. claude-grc-engineering turns technical evidence from cloud, SaaS, code, and security tools into framework-aligned findings, gap reports, remediation guidance, evidence packages, and OSCAL workflows.
Repo: GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering
Other commands on trust-center.
- /research
Start or resume an academic research project — idea through literature, methodology, writing, feedback, and publishing
Open command - /collect
Query AWS for compliance-relevant configuration across IAM, S3, CloudTrail, EBS, and emit findings conforming to the v1 contract.
Open command - /setup
Install the frdocx-to-froscal-ssp Python pipeline and verify its dependencies. Idempotent.
Open command - /status
Check the deployment status of the trust center.
Open command - /scan
Run testssl.sh against one or more HTTPS endpoints and emit v1 Findings mapped to SOC 2, NIST 800-53, PCI DSS 4.0.1, ISO 27001, and SCF controls.
Open command - /compliance-posture
Serve a localhost compliance posture dashboard from monitor-continuous JSON
Open command

