Skip to content
Security
Command

/ig-select

Determine appropriate CIS Controls Implementation Group (IG1/IG2/IG3)

From plugin
trust-center
367139 skills139 commands1 MCP
Install
$ npx -y skills add GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfClaude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/ig-select

Context preview

What this command does when you run it.

Determine appropriate CIS Controls Implementation Group (IG1/IG2/IG3)

Command definition

ig-select.md
description: Determine appropriate CIS Controls Implementation Group (IG1/IG2/IG3)

> _CIS Controls v8 content used under CC BY-SA 4.0 from the Center for Internet Security. This command's CIS-derived content is CC BY-SA 4.0. See [LICENSE-CIS.md](../LICENSE-CIS.md)._

CIS Controls IG Selection

Helps determine the appropriate Implementation Group (IG1, IG2, or IG3) for your organization based on size, resources, risk profile, and adversary sophistication.

Arguments

  • `$1` - Organization size (optional: small, medium, large)
  • `$2` - Risk profile (optional: low, moderate, high, critical)

Implementation Group Decision Framework

IG1 - Essential Cyber Hygiene (56 Safeguards)

**Recommended For**:

  • Small to medium businesses (<100 employees)
  • Limited IT security resources (1-2 IT staff, no dedicated security team)
  • Standard business risk profile
  • Not targeted by advanced persistent threats
  • Limited regulatory compliance requirements

**Resource Requirements**:

  • Part-time security focus (can be handled by IT staff)
  • Basic security tools (antivirus, firewall, backup)
  • Budget: $10K-$50K annually
  • Minimal specialized expertise needed

**Threat Profile**:

  • Opportunistic attacks (phishing, ransomware)
  • Automated scanning/exploitation
  • Commodity malware
  • Script kiddies, unsophisticated attackers

**Example Organizations**:

  • Local retailers
  • Professional services firms
  • Small healthcare practices
  • Regional nonprofits
  • Educational institutions (K-12)

IG2 - Enterprise Security (128 Safeguards)

**Recommended For**:

  • Medium to large organizations (100-1,000 employees)
  • Dedicated IT team with security responsibilities
  • Moderate regulatory requirements (HIPAA, PCI-DSS, etc.)
  • Handle sensitive customer or business data
  • Potential target for more sophisticated attacks

**Resource Requirements**:

  • Dedicated security staff (1-3 FTEs)
  • Enterprise security tools (SIEM, EDR, vulnerability scanner)
  • Budget: $100K-$500K annually
  • Some specialized security expertise

**Threat Profile**:

  • Targeted phishing campaigns
  • Financially motivated cybercriminals
  • Ransomware groups
  • Industrial espionage
  • Nation-state actors (lower tier)

**Example Organizations**:

  • Mid-sized healthcare systems
  • Financial services companies
  • Manufacturing firms
  • Regional government agencies
  • SaaS providers

IG3 - Advanced Security (153 Safeguards)

**Recommended For**:

  • Large enterprises (1,000+ employees)
  • Critical infrastructure organizations
  • High-value assets or intellectual property
  • Stringent regulatory requirements (CMMC L3, critical infrastructure)
  • Known targets of sophisticated adversaries

**Resource Requirements**:

  • Security Operations Center (SOC) team (5+ FTEs)
  • Advanced security tools (threat intelligence, behavioral analysis, SOAR)
  • Budget: $1M+ annually
  • Highly specialized security expertise (threat hunters, forensics, IR)

**Threat Profile**:

  • Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs)
  • Nation-state actors
  • Sophisticated cybercriminal organizations
  • Insider threats
  • Supply chain attacks

**Example Organizations**:

  • Fortune 500 companies
  • Defense contractors
  • Major healthcare systems
  • Critical infrastructure (energy, utilities, transportation)
  • Large financial institutions

Selection Criteria Matrix

| Factor | IG1 | IG2 | IG3 | |--------|-----|-----|-----| | **Employees** | <100 | 100-1,000 | 1,000+ | | **IT Staff** | 1-2 generalists | 3-10 with security focus | 10+ dedicated security | | **Annual Revenue** | <$10M | $10M-$1B | $1B+ | | **Data Sensitivity** | Basic business data | Customer PII, PHI | Trade secrets, critical infrastructure | | **Regulatory** | Minimal | Moderate (HIPAA, SOX) | High (CMMC, NERC CIP) | | **Threat Level** | Opportunistic | Targeted | Advanced/persistent | | **Security Budget** | <$50K | $100K-$500K | $1M+ | | **Downtime Tolerance** | Hours-days | Hours | Minutes |

Progressive Implementation Approach

Organizations should consider a phased approach:

**Phase 1**: Implement IG1 (Foundation)

  • Timeline: 6-12 months
  • Focus: Essential cyber hygiene
  • Quick wins with high impact

**Phase 2**: Advance to IG2 (If needed)

  • Timeline: 12-24 months
  • Focus: Enterprise processes and automation
  • Build on IG1 foundation

**Phase 3**: Advance to IG3 (If needed)

  • Timeline: 24-36 months
  • Focus: Advanced threat detection and response
  • Mature security operations

Risk-Based Considerations

**High-Risk Factors** (may warrant higher IG):

  • Handles sensitive data (PII, PHI, financial, IP)
  • Critical infrastructure sector
  • Known target of sophisticated threats
  • High-profile or controversial organization
  • Supply chain for critical industries
  • Regulatory enforcement history

**Offsetting Factors** (may allow lower IG):

  • Limited attack surface (air-gapped, isolated)
  • Strong compensating controls
  • Cyber insurance requirements met
  • Managed security service provider (MSSP) support
  • Cloud-native with strong CSP security

Industry Benchmarks

**Healthcare**:

  • Small practices: IG1
  • Mid-sized systems: IG2
  • Large hospital networks: IG3

**Financial Services**:

  • Credit unions: IG1-IG2
  • Regional banks: IG2
  • National banks: IG3

**Manufacturing**:

  • Job shops: IG1
  • Mid-market: IG2
  • OEMs with IP: IG3

**Technology**:

  • Startups: IG1
  • Growth stage: IG2
  • Enterprise SaaS: IG3

Output

1. **Recommended IG Level**: IG1, IG2, or IG3 2. **Justification**: Factors driving the recommendation 3. **Resource Requirements**: Estimated staff, budget, tools needed 4. **Safeguard Count**: How many controls to implement (56, 128, or 153) 5. **Implementation Timeline**: Realistic timeframe to reach target IG 6. **Cost-Benefit Analysis**: Security value vs implementation cost 7. **Progressive Path**: If starting lower, roadmap to advance IG levels

Examples

# Determine IG for small healthcare practice
/cis:ig-select small moderate

# Assess IG needs for large financial institution
/cis:ig-select large
Read more
Ships withtrust-center

Open-source GRC Engineering resource for Claude. claude-grc-engineering turns technical evidence from cloud, SaaS, code, and security tools into framework-aligned findings, gap reports, remediation guidance, evidence packages, and OSCAL workflows.

Get the whole plugin, auto-invoked
Stats
367
Stars
0
Views
82
Forks
Active
Maintenance
JavaScript
Language
1d ago
Last commit
7mo ago
Created

Repo: GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering