/paid-channel-prioritizer

name: paid-channel-prioritizer
description: >
  For founders who don't know where to start with paid ads. Analyzes ICP, competitor
  ad presence, budget constraints, and product type to recommend which 1-2 paid channels
  to start with and provides a 90-day ramp plan. Prevents the common mistake of
  spreading a small budget across too many platforms.
tags: [ads]

Paid Channel Prioritizer

Answer the question every early-stage founder asks: "Where should I run ads?" This skill analyzes your product, ICP, competitors, and budget to recommend the right 1-2 channels to start with — plus a 90-day plan to get there.

**Core principle:** A $3K/month ad budget split across Google, Meta, LinkedIn, and TikTok means $750/channel — not enough for any platform to learn and optimize. This skill picks the best 1-2 channels and concentrates budget where it'll compound fastest.

When to Use

• "Where should I run ads?"
• "Which ad platform is best for us?"
• "I have $X/month for ads — where should I spend it?"
• "Should I do Google Ads or Facebook Ads?"
• "Help me choose a paid channel"

Phase 0: Intake

1. **Product name + URL** — What are you selling? 2. **Business model** — SaaS / Marketplace / E-commerce / Service / App 3. **B2B or B2C?** — Drives channel selection heavily 4. **ICP** — Who are you selling to? (Role, company size, industry) 5. **Monthly ad budget** — Be honest — how much can you spend? 6. **Average deal size / LTV** — What's a customer worth? 7. **Current acquisition channels** — How are you getting customers today? (Organic, referral, outbound, etc.) 8. **Competitor names** — 3-5 competitors 9. **Landing page ready?** — Do you have a dedicated LP or just a homepage? 10. **Conversion goal** — Free trial / Demo / Purchase / Lead magnet download

Phase 1: Channel Scoring

1A: Buyer Intent Analysis

Where does your buyer look when they have a problem?

| Buyer Journey Stage | Likely Channel | Signal | |--------------------|---------------|--------| | "I need a tool for X" (active search) | **Google Search** | High-intent keywords exist | | "I'm browsing and see something relevant" (passive) | **Meta (FB/IG)** | Visual/emotional product | | "I need to solve this at work" (professional) | **LinkedIn** | B2B decision-maker targeting | | "Everyone's talking about this" (social proof) | **Twitter/X Ads** | Category is trending | | "I watch content about this" (education) | **YouTube** | Long consideration cycle | | "I discovered it through content" (entertainment) | **TikTok** | B2C, young audience, visual |

1B: Competitor Ad Presence Research

Use web search to check publicly accessible ad libraries and gather competitor ad intelligence:

web_search: site:facebook.com/ads/library "[competitor name]"
web_search: "[competitor name]" Google Ads OR PPC OR paid search
web_search: "[competitor name]" LinkedIn Ads OR sponsored
web_search: "[competitor name]" advertising strategy

The Meta Ad Library (facebook.com/ads/library) and Google Ads Transparency Center (adstransparency.google.com) are publicly accessible — search them directly to see what competitors are running.

Build a competitor channel map:

| Competitor | Google | Meta | LinkedIn | Twitter | YouTube | TikTok | |-----------|--------|------|----------|---------|---------|--------| | [Comp A] | [Active/Not found] | [N ads] | [Active/Not found] | ... | ... | ... | | [Comp B] | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

**Insight:** Where competitors are spending = validated channel. Where they're absent = opportunity or dead end.

1C: Channel Scoring Matrix

Score each channel for this specific product:

| Factor (Weight) | Google Search | Meta | LinkedIn | YouTube | Twitter | TikTok | |----------------|--------------|------|----------|---------|---------|--------| | **Buyer intent** (25%) | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | | **Targeting precision** (20%) | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | | **Competitor validation** (15%) | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | | **Budget efficiency** (15%) | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | | **ICP reachability** (15%) | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | | **Creative requirements** (10%) | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | [1-10] | | **Weighted Score** | [X/10] | [X/10] | [X/10] | [X/10] | [X/10] | [X/10] |

Channel Context Notes

| Channel | Best For | Worst For | Min Viable Budget | Creative Needs | |---------|---------|-----------|-------------------|---------------| | **Google Search** | High-intent capture, B2B, established category | New categories nobody searches for | $1K/mo | Text ads (low barrier) | | **Meta (FB/IG)** | Visual products, B2C, retargeting, lookalikes | Niche B2B with tiny audience | $1K/mo | Images + video (medium) | | **LinkedIn** | B2B enterprise, specific titles/industries | B2C, budget-conscious startups | $3K/mo | Professional content (medium) | | **YouTube** | Education-heavy products, long consideration | Impulse purchases, tiny budgets | $2K/mo | Video production (high) | | **Twitter/X** | Dev tools, trending categories, tech audiences | Mainstream B2C, precise targeting | $1K/mo | Short-form copy (low) | | **TikTok** | B2C, Gen Z/millennial, visual/fun products | B2B enterprise, older audience | $500/mo | Short video (high frequency) |

Phase 2: Recommendation

Primary Channel Selection

Pick the #1 channel based on: 1. Highest weighted score 2. Budget viability (can they afford minimum viable spend?) 3. Creative readiness (can they produce the required content?)

Secondary Channel Selection

Pick channel #2 only if:

• Budget > $3K/month (enough for two channels)
• It serves a different funnel stage than channel #1
• It doesn't require creative they can't produce

Budget Allocation

| Budget Level | Recommendation | |-------------|---------------| | < $1.5K/mo | **1 channel only** — concentrate everything | |