/flow-next-qa
Live-app real-user QA pass derived from the spec. Drives the running app via flow-next-drive, derives scenarios from the spec's AC / R-IDs / boundaries, files structured P0/P1/P2 findings with evidence, and ends with a YES/NO ship verdict receipt. Consumes `.flow/features/`
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add gmickel/flow-next --skill flow-next-qa --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add gmickel/flow-next --skill flow-next-qa -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add gmickel/flow-next --skill flow-next-qa -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add gmickel/flow-next --skill flow-next-qa -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add gmickel/flow-next --skill flow-next-qa -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add gmickel/flow-next --skill flow-next-qa -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add gmickel/flow-next --skill flow-next-qa -a windsurf -y
SKILL.md
flow-next-qa.SKILL.mdname: flow-next-qa
description: Live-app real-user QA pass derived from the spec. Drives the running app via flow-next-drive, derives scenarios from the spec's AC / R-IDs / boundaries, files structured P0/P1/P2 findings with evidence, and ends with a YES/NO ship verdict receipt. Consumes `.flow/features/` navigation when present. Triggers on /flow-next:qa with a spec id. Runs user-invoked OR as the optional `pipeline.qa` stage of `flow --auto` (default off). Augments — never replaces — CI/staging/manual QA. FORBIDDEN from marking PASS by reading source — the verdict rests on captured evidence from the live app, never on agent narration.
user-invocable: false
allowed-tools: AskUserQuestion, Read, Bash, Grep, Glob, Write, Edit, Task
/flow-next:qa — live-app real-user QA pass
Drive the running app the way an unforgiving real user would, with scenarios taken from the spec, file P0/P1/P2 findings with captured evidence, and end with a YES/NO ship verdict written as a `qa_verdict` receipt. The spec is the source of intent: acceptance criteria become scenarios, R-IDs become the coverage table, boundaries say what not to test, decision context says what the app should do.
QA is a cheap first live pass over the finished build. It does not replace CI, staging or manual QA, and it does not fix product code: it files, surfaces and hands off. Findings are advisory; the human reviewer and the land gate decide.
It runs when the user invokes it, or as the optional `pipeline.qa` stage (`off | on | auto`, default `off`) that `/flow-next:flow` runs after all tasks are done and before make-pr. When setting or reading that key, read [gate-selection.md](../flow-next-flow/references/gate-selection.md); [`flowctl.md`](../../docs/flowctl.md) has the config row. Enable the stage only where `/flow-next:prime` reports the app is QA-ready (seeded data, a documented dev login, a drivable surface, readable runtime evidence); otherwise every run ends BLOCKED.
Read [working-rules.md](../../references/working-rules.md) first unless you already have this run; it holds for every step.
This skill runs inline on the host (not forked) so it can ask the user for undocumented facts.
The hard rule
**SHIP rests on evidence captured from the running app** (screenshots, console output, observed state). A SHIP reached by reading the source or the diff, from narration, or from "the code looks right" has broken this. With no reachable app or no driver, the outcome is BLOCKED, never a pass. Reading source to explain a failure you already captured is fine.
Arguments
The first non-flag token is the spec id. `--target <url>`, `--receipt <path>` and `--base <ref>` take a value (as `--flag value` or `--flag=value`). `mode:autonomous` turns on autonomous mode.
SPEC_ID=""; PREV=""
# No positional parameters: the host rewrites them inside skill code blocks.
# Quote the pasted arguments once so a URL's `&` or `;` stays data.
RAW_ARGS="$ARGUMENTS"
for ARG in $(printf '%s\n' "$RAW_ARGS"); do
case "$PREV" in
--target) QA_TARGET_URL="$ARG"; PREV=""; continue ;;
--receipt) QA_RECEIPT_OVERRIDE="$ARG"; PREV=""; continue ;;
--base) QA_BASE_REF="$ARG"; PREV=""; continue ;;
esac
case "$ARG" in
--target|--receipt|--base) PREV="$ARG" ;;
--target=*) QA_TARGET_URL="${ARG#--target=}" ;;
--receipt=*) QA_RECEIPT_OVERRIDE="${ARG#--receipt=}" ;;
--base=*) QA_BASE_REF="${ARG#--base=}" ;;
mode:autonomous) QA_AUTONOMOUS=1 ;;
-*) echo "Unknown flag: $ARG (ignored)" >&2 ;;
*) [[ -z "$SPEC_ID" ]] && SPEC_ID="$ARG" ;;
esac
done
[[ -n "$PREV" ]] && echo "Flag $PREV given without a value (ignored)" >&2
[[ "${FLOW_AUTONOMOUS:-}" == "1" ]] && QA_AUTONOMOUS=1
NO_PROMPT=0
[[ "${QA_AUTONOMOUS:-}" == "1" || "${AUTONOMOUS:-}" == "1" ]] && NO_PROMPT=1
export QA_TARGET_URL QA_RECEIPT_OVERRIDE QA_BASE_REF QA_AUTONOMOUS NO_PROMPT**Autonomous mode** (`NO_PROMPT=1`; `flow --auto` dispatches with `mode:autonomous`) asks nothing. Each fact the interactive run would ask for is resolved from the spec, config or environment; when it cannot be, the run writes a BLOCKED receipt and exits cleanly. The one exception is an unresolvable spec id, which is an error (non-zero exit, message on stderr).
Now follow [workflow.md](workflow.md): discover, derive, prepare, execute, file, verdict.
Read more
name: flow-next-qa description: Live-app real-user QA pass derived from the spec. Drives the running app via flow-next-drive, derives scenarios from the spec's AC / R-IDs / boundaries, files structured P0/P1/P2 findings with evidence, and ends with a YES/NO ship verdict receipt. Consumes `.flow/features/` navigation when present. Triggers on /flow-next:qa with a spec id. Runs user-invoked OR as the optional `pipeline.qa` stage of `flow --auto` (default off). Augments — never replaces — CI/staging/manual QA. FORBIDDEN from marking PASS by reading source — the verdict rests on captured evidence from the live app, never on agent narration. user-invocable: false allowed-tools: AskUserQuestion, Read, Bash, Grep, Glob, Write, Edit, Task
/flow-next:qa — live-app real-user QA pass
Drive the running app the way an unforgiving real user would, with scenarios taken from the spec, file P0/P1/P2 findings with captured evidence, and end with a YES/NO ship verdict written as a `qa_verdict` receipt. The spec is the source of intent: acceptance criteria become scenarios, R-IDs become the coverage table, boundaries say what not to test, decision context says what the app should do.
QA is a cheap first live pass over the finished build. It does not replace CI, staging or manual QA, and it does not fix product code: it files, surfaces and hands off. Findings are advisory; the human reviewer and the land gate decide.
It runs when the user invokes it, or as the optional `pipeline.qa` stage (`off | on | auto`, default `off`) that `/flow-next:flow` runs after all tasks are done and before make-pr. When setting or reading that key, read [gate-selection.md](../flow-next-flow/references/gate-selection.md); [`flowctl.md`](../../docs/flowctl.md) has the config row. Enable the stage only where `/flow-next:prime` reports the app is QA-ready (seeded data, a documented dev login, a drivable surface, readable runtime evidence); otherwise every run ends BLOCKED.
Read [working-rules.md](../../references/working-rules.md) first unless you already have this run; it holds for every step.
This skill runs inline on the host (not forked) so it can ask the user for undocumented facts.
The hard rule
**SHIP rests on evidence captured from the running app** (screenshots, console output, observed state). A SHIP reached by reading the source or the diff, from narration, or from "the code looks right" has broken this. With no reachable app or no driver, the outcome is BLOCKED, never a pass. Reading source to explain a failure you already captured is fine.
Arguments
The first non-flag token is the spec id. `--target <url>`, `--receipt <path>` and `--base <ref>` take a value (as `--flag value` or `--flag=value`). `mode:autonomous` turns on autonomous mode.
SPEC_ID=""; PREV=""
# No positional parameters: the host rewrites them inside skill code blocks.
# Quote the pasted arguments once so a URL's `&` or `;` stays data.
RAW_ARGS="$ARGUMENTS"
for ARG in $(printf '%s\n' "$RAW_ARGS"); do
case "$PREV" in
--target) QA_TARGET_URL="$ARG"; PREV=""; continue ;;
--receipt) QA_RECEIPT_OVERRIDE="$ARG"; PREV=""; continue ;;
--base) QA_BASE_REF="$ARG"; PREV=""; continue ;;
esac
case "$ARG" in
--target|--receipt|--base) PREV="$ARG" ;;
--target=*) QA_TARGET_URL="${ARG#--target=}" ;;
--receipt=*) QA_RECEIPT_OVERRIDE="${ARG#--receipt=}" ;;
--base=*) QA_BASE_REF="${ARG#--base=}" ;;
mode:autonomous) QA_AUTONOMOUS=1 ;;
-*) echo "Unknown flag: $ARG (ignored)" >&2 ;;
*) [[ -z "$SPEC_ID" ]] && SPEC_ID="$ARG" ;;
esac
done
[[ -n "$PREV" ]] && echo "Flag $PREV given without a value (ignored)" >&2
[[ "${FLOW_AUTONOMOUS:-}" == "1" ]] && QA_AUTONOMOUS=1
NO_PROMPT=0
[[ "${QA_AUTONOMOUS:-}" == "1" || "${AUTONOMOUS:-}" == "1" ]] && NO_PROMPT=1
export QA_TARGET_URL QA_RECEIPT_OVERRIDE QA_BASE_REF QA_AUTONOMOUS NO_PROMPT**Autonomous mode** (`NO_PROMPT=1`; `flow --auto` dispatches with `mode:autonomous`) asks nothing. Each fact the interactive run would ask for is resolved from the spec, config or environment; when it cannot be, the run writes a BLOCKED receipt and exits cleanly. The one exception is an unresolvable spec id, which is an error (non-zero exit, message on stderr).
Now follow [workflow.md](workflow.md): discover, derive, prepare, execute, file, verdict.
Faster than your agent alone. And better. A workflow plugin that takes a bug, idea or ticket to a verified pull request: specs, cross-model review by risk, live QA, receipts in your repo. Claude Code · Codex · Cursor · Droid · Grok Build · OpenCode · Muse Code.
Other skills on flow-next.
More skills from other plugins.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
ask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Questions about flow-next-qa.
- Which coding agents can use flow-next-qa?
- flow-next-qa installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.

