/skill-scanner
Scan agent skills for security issues. Use when asked to "scan a skill",
$ npx -y skills add getsentry/sentry-skills --skill skill-scanner --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/skill-scanner
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Scan agent skills for security issues. Use when asked to "scan a skill",
SKILL.md
skill-scanner.SKILL.mdname: skill-scanner
description: Scan agent skills for security issues. Use when asked to "scan a skill",
"audit a skill", "review skill security", "check skill for injection", "validate SKILL.md",
or assess whether an agent skill is safe to install. Checks for prompt injection,
malicious scripts, excessive permissions, secret exposure, and supply chain risks.
allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash
Skill Security Scanner
Scan agent skills for security issues before adoption. Detects prompt injection, malicious code, excessive permissions, secret exposure, and supply chain risks.
**Requires**: The `uv` CLI for python package management, install guide at https://docs.astral.sh/uv/getting-started/installation/
**Important**: Run all scripts from the repository root. Script paths like `scripts/scan_skill.py` are relative to this skill's root directory (the directory containing this SKILL.md), not relative to the target repository.
Bundled Script
`scripts/scan_skill.py`
Static analysis scanner that detects deterministic patterns. Outputs structured JSON.
uv run scripts/scan_skill.py <skill-directory>
Returns JSON with findings, URLs, structure info, and severity counts. The script catches patterns mechanically — your job is to evaluate intent and filter false positives.
Workflow
Phase 1: Input & Discovery
Determine the scan target:
- If the user provides a skill directory path, use it directly
- If the user names a skill, look for it under `.agents/skills/<name>/` first, then other established layouts such as `skills/<name>/` when the repo uses a canonical root skill tree, `.claude/skills/<name>/`, `plugins/*/skills/<name>/`, or another repo-managed skill root with clear prior art
- If the user says "scan all skills", discover all `*/SKILL.md` files and scan each
Validate the target contains a `SKILL.md` file. List the skill structure:
ls -la <skill-directory>/
ls <skill-directory>/references/ 2>/dev/null
ls <skill-directory>/scripts/ 2>/dev/null
Phase 2: Automated Static Scan
Run the bundled scanner:
uv run scripts/scan_skill.py <skill-directory>
Parse the JSON output. The script produces findings with severity levels, URL analysis, and structure information. Use these as leads for deeper analysis.
**Fallback**: If the script fails, proceed with manual analysis using Grep patterns from the reference files.
Phase 3: Frontmatter Validation
Read the SKILL.md and check:
- **Required fields**: `name` and `description` must be present
- **Name consistency**: `name` field should match the directory name
- **Tool assessment**: Review `allowed-tools` — is Bash justified? Are tools unrestricted (`*`)?
- **Model override**: Is a specific model forced? Why?
- **Description quality**: Does the description accurately represent what the skill does?
Phase 4: Prompt Injection Analysis
Load `references/prompt-injection-patterns.md` for context.
Review scanner findings in the "Prompt Injection" category. For each finding:
1. Read the surrounding context in the file 2. Determine if the pattern is **performing** injection (malicious) or **discussing/detecting** injection (legitimate) 3. Skills about security, testing, or education commonly reference injection patterns — this is expected
**Critical distinction**: A security review skill that lists injection patterns in its references is documenting threats, not attacking. Only flag patterns that would execute against the agent running the skill.
Phase 5: Behavioral Analysis
This phase is agent-only — no pattern matching. Read the full SKILL.md instructions and evaluate:
**Description vs. instructions alignment**:
- Does the description match what the instructions actually tell the agent to do?
- A skill described as "code formatter" that instructs the agent to read ~/.ssh is misaligned
**Config/memory poisoning**:
- Instructions to modify `CLAUDE.md`, `MEMORY.md`, `settings.json`, `.mcp.json`, or hook configurations
- Instructions to add itself to allowlists or auto-approve permissions
- Writing to `~/.claude/`, `~/.agents/`, or any agent configuration directory
- Scripts that append to global config files — the poisoned instructions persist after skill removal
**Scope creep**:
- Instructions that exceed the skill's stated purpose
- Unnecessary data gathering (reading files unrelated to the skill's function)
- Instructions to install other skills, plugins, or dependencies not mentioned in the description
**Information gathering**:
- Reading environment variables beyond what's needed
- Listing directory contents outside the skill's scope
- Accessing git history, credentials, or user data unnecessarily
**Structural attacks** (check scanner output for these):
- **Symlinks**: Files that resolve outside the skill directory — can disguise reads of `~/.ssh/id_rsa`, `~/.aws/credentials`, etc. as "example" files
- **Frontmatter hooks**: `PostToolUse`/`PreToolUse` hooks in YAML — execute shell commands automatically, the model cannot prevent it
- **`!`command`` syntax**: Runs shell commands at skill load time during template expansion, before the model sees the prompt
- **Test files**: `conftest.py`, `test_*.py`, `*.test.js` — test runners auto-discover and execute these as side effects of `pytest` or `npm test`
- **npm lifecycle hooks**: `postinstall` scripts in bundled `package.json` — run automatically on `npm install`
- **Image metadata**: PNG files with text in metadata chunks (tEXt/iTXt) — multimodal LLMs can read hidden instructions from image metadata
Phase 6: Script Analysis
If the skill has a `scripts/` directory:
1. Load `references/dangerous-code-patterns.md` for context 2. Read each script file fully (do not skip any) 3. Check scanner findings in the "Malicious Code" category 4. For each finding, evaluate:
- **Data exfiltration**: Does the script send data to external URLs? What data?
- **Reverse shells**: Socket connections with red
Read more
name: skill-scanner description: Scan agent skills for security issues. Use when asked to "scan a skill", "audit a skill", "review skill security", "check skill for injection", "validate SKILL.md", or assess whether an agent skill is safe to install. Checks for prompt injection, malicious scripts, excessive permissions, secret exposure, and supply chain risks. allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash
Skill Security Scanner
Scan agent skills for security issues before adoption. Detects prompt injection, malicious code, excessive permissions, secret exposure, and supply chain risks.
**Requires**: The `uv` CLI for python package management, install guide at https://docs.astral.sh/uv/getting-started/installation/
**Important**: Run all scripts from the repository root. Script paths like `scripts/scan_skill.py` are relative to this skill's root directory (the directory containing this SKILL.md), not relative to the target repository.
Bundled Script
`scripts/scan_skill.py`
Static analysis scanner that detects deterministic patterns. Outputs structured JSON.
uv run scripts/scan_skill.py <skill-directory>
Returns JSON with findings, URLs, structure info, and severity counts. The script catches patterns mechanically — your job is to evaluate intent and filter false positives.
Workflow
Phase 1: Input & Discovery
Determine the scan target:
- If the user provides a skill directory path, use it directly
- If the user names a skill, look for it under `.agents/skills/<name>/` first, then other established layouts such as `skills/<name>/` when the repo uses a canonical root skill tree, `.claude/skills/<name>/`, `plugins/*/skills/<name>/`, or another repo-managed skill root with clear prior art
- If the user says "scan all skills", discover all `*/SKILL.md` files and scan each
Validate the target contains a `SKILL.md` file. List the skill structure:
ls -la <skill-directory>/ ls <skill-directory>/references/ 2>/dev/null ls <skill-directory>/scripts/ 2>/dev/null
Phase 2: Automated Static Scan
Run the bundled scanner:
uv run scripts/scan_skill.py <skill-directory>
Parse the JSON output. The script produces findings with severity levels, URL analysis, and structure information. Use these as leads for deeper analysis.
**Fallback**: If the script fails, proceed with manual analysis using Grep patterns from the reference files.
Phase 3: Frontmatter Validation
Read the SKILL.md and check:
- **Required fields**: `name` and `description` must be present
- **Name consistency**: `name` field should match the directory name
- **Tool assessment**: Review `allowed-tools` — is Bash justified? Are tools unrestricted (`*`)?
- **Model override**: Is a specific model forced? Why?
- **Description quality**: Does the description accurately represent what the skill does?
Phase 4: Prompt Injection Analysis
Load `references/prompt-injection-patterns.md` for context.
Review scanner findings in the "Prompt Injection" category. For each finding:
1. Read the surrounding context in the file 2. Determine if the pattern is **performing** injection (malicious) or **discussing/detecting** injection (legitimate) 3. Skills about security, testing, or education commonly reference injection patterns — this is expected
**Critical distinction**: A security review skill that lists injection patterns in its references is documenting threats, not attacking. Only flag patterns that would execute against the agent running the skill.
Phase 5: Behavioral Analysis
This phase is agent-only — no pattern matching. Read the full SKILL.md instructions and evaluate:
**Description vs. instructions alignment**:
- Does the description match what the instructions actually tell the agent to do?
- A skill described as "code formatter" that instructs the agent to read ~/.ssh is misaligned
**Config/memory poisoning**:
- Instructions to modify `CLAUDE.md`, `MEMORY.md`, `settings.json`, `.mcp.json`, or hook configurations
- Instructions to add itself to allowlists or auto-approve permissions
- Writing to `~/.claude/`, `~/.agents/`, or any agent configuration directory
- Scripts that append to global config files — the poisoned instructions persist after skill removal
**Scope creep**:
- Instructions that exceed the skill's stated purpose
- Unnecessary data gathering (reading files unrelated to the skill's function)
- Instructions to install other skills, plugins, or dependencies not mentioned in the description
**Information gathering**:
- Reading environment variables beyond what's needed
- Listing directory contents outside the skill's scope
- Accessing git history, credentials, or user data unnecessarily
**Structural attacks** (check scanner output for these):
- **Symlinks**: Files that resolve outside the skill directory — can disguise reads of `~/.ssh/id_rsa`, `~/.aws/credentials`, etc. as "example" files
- **Frontmatter hooks**: `PostToolUse`/`PreToolUse` hooks in YAML — execute shell commands automatically, the model cannot prevent it
- **`!`command`` syntax**: Runs shell commands at skill load time during template expansion, before the model sees the prompt
- **Test files**: `conftest.py`, `test_*.py`, `*.test.js` — test runners auto-discover and execute these as side effects of `pytest` or `npm test`
- **npm lifecycle hooks**: `postinstall` scripts in bundled `package.json` — run automatically on `npm install`
- **Image metadata**: PNG files with text in metadata chunks (tEXt/iTXt) — multimodal LLMs can read hidden instructions from image metadata
Phase 6: Script Analysis
If the skill has a `scripts/` directory:
1. Load `references/dangerous-code-patterns.md` for context 2. Read each script file fully (do not skip any) 3. Check scanner findings in the "Malicious Code" category 4. For each finding, evaluate:
- **Data exfiltration**: Does the script send data to external URLs? What data?
- **Reverse shells**: Socket connections with red
For skills to help set up Sentry in your project or debug production issues, see Agent skills for Sentry employees, following the Agent Skills open format.
Repo: getsentry/sentry-skills
Other skills on sentry-skills.
- /agents-md
Creates and maintains concise AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md project instruction files. Use when asked to create AGENTS.md, update AGENTS.md, maintain agent docs, set up CLAUDE.md, document repository agent conventions, or keep coding-agent instructions minimal and reference-backed.
Open skill - /blog-writing-guide
Write, review, and improve blog posts for the Sentry engineering blog following Sentry's specific writing standards, voice, and quality bar. Use this skill whenever someone asks to write a blog post, draft a technical article, review blog content, improve a draft, write a
Open skill - /brand-guidelines
Write copy following Sentry brand guidelines. Use when writing UI text, error messages, empty states, onboarding flows, 404 pages, documentation, marketing copy, or any user-facing content. Covers both Plain Speech (default) and Sentry Voice tones.
Open skill - /claude-settings-audit
Analyze a repository to generate recommended Claude Code settings.json permissions. Use when setting up a new project, auditing existing settings, or determining which read-only bash commands to allow. Detects tech stack, build tools, and monorepo structure.
Open skill - /code-review
Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.
Open skill - /code-simplifier
Simplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. Use when asked to "simplify code", "clean up code", "refactor for clarity", "improve readability", or review recently modified code for elegance. Focuses on
Open skill

