Skip to content
Backend
Skill

/oban-thinking

This skill should be used when the user asks to "add a background job", "process async", "schedule a task", "retry failed jobs", "add email sending", "run this later", "add a cron job", "unique jobs", "batch process", or mentions Oban, Oban Pro, workflows, job queues, cascades,

From plugin
claude-code-elixir
1676 skills
Install
$ npx -y skills add georgeguimaraes/claude-code-elixir --skill oban-thinking --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/oban-thinking

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "add a background job", "process async", "schedule a task", "retry failed jobs", "add email sending", "run this later", "add a cron job", "unique jobs", "batch process", or mentions Oban, Oban Pro, workflows, job queues, cascades,

SKILL.md

oban-thinking.SKILL.md
name: oban-thinking
description: This skill should be used when the user asks to "add a background job", "process async", "schedule a task", "retry failed jobs", "add email sending", "run this later", "add a cron job", "unique jobs", "batch process", or mentions Oban, Oban Pro, workflows, job queues, cascades, grafting, recorded values, job args, or troubleshooting job failures.

Oban Thinking

Paradigm shifts for Oban job processing. These insights prevent common bugs and guide proper patterns.

---

Part 1: Oban (Non-Pro)

The Iron Law: JSON Serialization

JOB ARGS ARE JSON. ATOMS BECOME STRINGS.

This single fact causes most Oban debugging headaches.

# Creating - atom keys are fine
MyWorker.new(%{user_id: 123})

# Processing - must use string keys (JSON converted atoms to strings)
def perform(%Oban.Job{args: %{"user_id" => user_id}}) do
  # ...
end

Error Handling: Let It Crash

**Don't catch errors in Oban jobs.** Let them bubble up to Oban for proper handling.

Why?

1. **Automatic logging**: Oban logs the full error with stacktrace 2. **Automatic retries**: Jobs retry with exponential backoff 3. **Visibility**: Failed jobs appear in Oban Web dashboard 4. **Consistency**: Error states are tracked in the database

Anti-Pattern

# Bad: Swallowing errors
def perform(%Oban.Job{} = job) do
  case do_work(job.args) do
    {:ok, result} -> {:ok, result}
    {:error, reason} ->
      Logger.error("Failed: #{reason}")
      {:ok, :failed}  # Silently marks as complete!
  end
end

Correct Pattern

# Good: Let errors propagate
def perform(%Oban.Job{} = job) do
  result = do_work!(job.args)  # Raises on failure
  {:ok, result}
end

# Or return error tuple - Oban treats as failure
def perform(%Oban.Job{} = job) do
  case do_work(job.args) do
    {:ok, result} -> {:ok, result}
    {:error, reason} -> {:error, reason}  # Oban will retry
  end
end

When to Catch Errors

Only catch errors when you need custom retry logic or want to mark a job as permanently failed:

def perform(%Oban.Job{} = job) do
  case external_api_call(job.args) do
    {:ok, result} -> {:ok, result}
    {:error, :not_found} -> {:cancel, :resource_not_found}  # Don't retry
    {:error, :rate_limited} -> {:snooze, 60}  # Retry in 60 seconds
    {:error, _} -> {:error, :will_retry}  # Normal retry
  end
end

Snoozing for Polling

Use `{:snooze, seconds}` for polling external state instead of manual retry logic:

def perform(%Oban.Job{} = job) do
  if external_thing_finished?(job.args) do
    {:ok, :done}
  else
    {:snooze, 5}  # Check again in 5 seconds
  end
end

Simple Job Chaining

For simple sequential chains (JobA → JobB → JobC), have each job enqueue the next:

def perform(%Oban.Job{} = job) do
  result = do_work(job.args)
  # Enqueue next job on success
  NextWorker.new(%{data: result}) |> Oban.insert()
  {:ok, result}
end

**Don't reach for Oban Pro Workflows for linear chains.**

Unique Jobs

Prevent duplicate jobs with the `unique` option:

use Oban.Worker,
  queue: :default,
  unique: [period: 60]  # Only one job with same args per 60 seconds

# Or scope uniqueness to specific fields
unique: [period: 300, keys: [:user_id]]

**Gotcha:** Uniqueness is checked on insert, not execution. Two identical jobs inserted 61 seconds apart will both run.

High Throughput: Chunking

For millions of records, **chunk work into batches** rather than one job per item:

# Bad: One job per contact (millions of jobs = database strain)
Enum.each(contacts, &ContactWorker.new(%{id: &1.id}) |> Oban.insert())

# Good: Chunk into batches
contacts
|> Enum.chunk_every(100)
|> Enum.each(&BatchWorker.new(%{contact_ids: Enum.map(&1, fn c -> c.id end)}) |> Oban.insert())

Use bulk inserts without uniqueness constraints for maximum throughput.

---

Part 2: Oban Pro

Cascade Context: Erlang Term Serialization

Unlike regular job args, **cascade context preserves atoms**:

# Creating - atom keys
Workflow.put_context(%{score_run_id: id})

# Processing - atom keys still work!
def my_cascade(%{score_run_id: id}) do
  # ...
end

# Dot notation works too
def later_step(context) do
  context.score_run_id
  context.previous_result
end

Serialization Summary

| | Creating | Processing | |-----------------|----------|--------------| | Regular jobs | atoms ok | strings only | | Cascade context | atoms ok | atoms ok |

When to Use Workflows

Reserve Workflows for:

  • Complex dependency graphs (not just linear chains)
  • Fan-out/fan-in patterns
  • When you need recorded values across steps
  • Conditional branching based on runtime state

**Don't use Workflows for simple A → B → C chains.**

Workflow Composition with Graft

When you need a parent workflow to wait for a sub-workflow to complete before continuing, use `add_graft` instead of `add_workflow`.

Key Differences

| Method | Sub-workflow completes before deps run? | Output accessible? | |--------|----------------------------------------|-------------------| | `add_workflow` | No - just inserts jobs | No | | `add_graft` | Yes - waits for all jobs | Yes, via recorded values |

Pattern: Composing Independent Concerns

Don't couple unrelated concerns (e.g., notifications) to domain-specific workflows (e.g., scoring). Instead, create a higher-level orchestrator:

# Bad: Notification logic buried in AggregateScores
defmodule AggregateScores do
  def workflow(score_run_id) do
    Workflow.new()
    |> Workflow.add(:aggregate, AggregateJob.new(...))
    |> Workflow.add(:send_notification, SendEmail.new(...), deps: :aggregate)  # Wrong place!
  end
end

# Good: Higher-level workflow composes scoring + notification
defmodule FullRunWithNotifications do
  def workflow(site_url, opts) do
    notification_opts = build_notification_opts(opts)

    Workflow.new()
    |> Workflow.put_context(%{notification_opts: noti
Read more
Ships withclaude-code-elixir

Claude Code plugins for Elixir development.

Get the whole plugin
Stats
168
Stars
15
Forks
Maintained
Maintenance
Shell
Language
Apache-2.0
License
3mo ago
Last commit
7mo ago
Created

Repo: georgeguimaraes/claude-code-elixir

Other skills on claude-code-elixir.