/ts-testing
Use when writing or configuring TypeScript tests and choosing between bun test and Vitest. Not for framework-specific testing (React → react-testing).
$ npx -y skills add fusengine/agents --skill ts-testing --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/ts-testing
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use when writing or configuring TypeScript tests and choosing between bun test and Vitest. Not for framework-specific testing (React → react-testing).
SKILL.md
ts-testing.SKILL.mdname: ts-testing
description: Use when writing or configuring TypeScript tests and choosing between bun test and Vitest. Not for framework-specific testing (React → react-testing).
versions:
bun: "1.3.14"
vitest: "4.1.9"
user-invocable: true
references: references/choosing-runner.md, references/bun-test.md, references/vitest.md, references/common-patterns.md, references/templates/bun-setup.md, references/templates/vitest-setup.md
related-skills: solid-generic, ts-packaging
<objective> This skill covers choosing between bun test (fastest cold start, zero-config TS/JSX, experimental coverage) and Vitest (V8/Istanbul coverage, multi-worker CI scaling, browser mode via Playwright) via a decision matrix by project shape, then configuring the chosen runner's shared Jest-like API — describe/it/expect, lifecycle hooks, mocks, and snapshots.
It also covers coverage thresholds, deterministic test isolation, and the rule to never mix bun:test and vitest imports in one package, or run bun test when the configured runner is actually Vitest.
Out of scope: framework-specific testing (React components → react-expert's react-testing, Laravel → laravel-testing) and browser E2E suites are not covered. </objective>
TypeScript Testing
Pick the right runner, then write tests with a shared Jest-compatible API.
Agent Workflow (MANDATORY)
Before ANY implementation, use `TeamCreate` to spawn 3 agents:
1. **fuse-ai-pilot:explore-codebase** - Detect existing runner, config, test layout 2. **fuse-ai-pilot:research-expert** - Verify latest bun test / Vitest docs via Context7/Exa 3. **mcp__context7__query-docs** - Check mock, coverage, config APIs
After implementation, run **fuse-ai-pilot:sniper** for validation.
---
Overview
Both runners share a Jest-like API (`describe`/`it`/`expect`, lifecycle hooks, snapshots, mocks). They differ on speed, coverage maturity, and CI scaling.
| Runner | Strength | Weakness | |--------|----------|----------| | `bun test` | Fastest cold start, zero-config TS/JSX, built-in | Single process, experimental coverage, mock limits | | Vitest | V8/Istanbul coverage, multi-worker CI scaling, ~Jest parity, browser mode | Needs Vite + config, slower cold start |
---
Critical Rules
1. **One runner per package** - Never mix `bun:test` and `vitest` imports 2. **`bun run test`, not `bun test`, when the runner is Vitest** - Else Bun runs its own 3. **Explicit coverage thresholds** - Fail CI below target, don't just report 4. **Deterministic tests** - Isolate shared state; use `--randomize` (Bun) to catch order bugs 5. **Mock at boundaries** - Network/FS/time, never internal implementation detail
---
Decision Guide
Choosing a runner?
├── Greenfield, Bun runtime, fast local TDD → bun test
├── Large suite / heavy CI parallelism → Vitest (multi-worker)
├── Migrating from Jest / need full coverage → Vitest (V8 + Istanbul)
├── Component/DOM in real browser → Vitest browser mode (Playwright)
└── Zero-dependency script or CLI → bun test
→ See `references/choosing-runner.md` for the full matrix
---
Reference Guide
Concepts
| Topic | Reference | Load when | |-------|-----------|-----------| | Runner selection | `references/choosing-runner.md` | Deciding bun test vs Vitest | | Bun test runner | `references/bun-test.md` | Using `bun test` | | Vitest | `references/vitest.md` | Using Vitest | | Shared API | `references/common-patterns.md` | Writing describe/it/mock/snapshot |
Templates
| Template | Use Case | |----------|----------| | `references/templates/bun-setup.md` | bunfig.toml + first Bun tests | | `references/templates/vitest-setup.md` | vitest.config.ts + coverage + CI |
---
Quick Start
Bun
import { test, expect } from "bun:test";
test("2 + 2", () => {
expect(2 + 2).toBe(4);
});bun test --coverage
→ See `references/templates/bun-setup.md`
Vitest
import { test, expect } from "vitest";
test("adds 1 + 2", () => {
expect(1 + 2).toBe(3);
});npx vitest run --coverage
→ See `references/templates/vitest-setup.md`
---
Best Practices
DO
- Colocate tests as `*.test.ts` next to source
- Assert inside every `waitFor`/async block
- Set per-test timeouts for network-bound tests
DON'T
- Mix both runners in one package
- Rely on test execution order
- Ship experimental Bun coverage as the sole quality gate on huge suites
Read more
name: ts-testing description: Use when writing or configuring TypeScript tests and choosing between bun test and Vitest. Not for framework-specific testing (React → react-testing). versions: bun: "1.3.14" vitest: "4.1.9" user-invocable: true references: references/choosing-runner.md, references/bun-test.md, references/vitest.md, references/common-patterns.md, references/templates/bun-setup.md, references/templates/vitest-setup.md related-skills: solid-generic, ts-packaging
<objective> This skill covers choosing between bun test (fastest cold start, zero-config TS/JSX, experimental coverage) and Vitest (V8/Istanbul coverage, multi-worker CI scaling, browser mode via Playwright) via a decision matrix by project shape, then configuring the chosen runner's shared Jest-like API — describe/it/expect, lifecycle hooks, mocks, and snapshots.
It also covers coverage thresholds, deterministic test isolation, and the rule to never mix bun:test and vitest imports in one package, or run bun test when the configured runner is actually Vitest.
Out of scope: framework-specific testing (React components → react-expert's react-testing, Laravel → laravel-testing) and browser E2E suites are not covered. </objective>
TypeScript Testing
Pick the right runner, then write tests with a shared Jest-compatible API.
Agent Workflow (MANDATORY)
Before ANY implementation, use `TeamCreate` to spawn 3 agents:
1. **fuse-ai-pilot:explore-codebase** - Detect existing runner, config, test layout 2. **fuse-ai-pilot:research-expert** - Verify latest bun test / Vitest docs via Context7/Exa 3. **mcp__context7__query-docs** - Check mock, coverage, config APIs
After implementation, run **fuse-ai-pilot:sniper** for validation.
---
Overview
Both runners share a Jest-like API (`describe`/`it`/`expect`, lifecycle hooks, snapshots, mocks). They differ on speed, coverage maturity, and CI scaling.
| Runner | Strength | Weakness | |--------|----------|----------| | `bun test` | Fastest cold start, zero-config TS/JSX, built-in | Single process, experimental coverage, mock limits | | Vitest | V8/Istanbul coverage, multi-worker CI scaling, ~Jest parity, browser mode | Needs Vite + config, slower cold start |
---
Critical Rules
1. **One runner per package** - Never mix `bun:test` and `vitest` imports 2. **`bun run test`, not `bun test`, when the runner is Vitest** - Else Bun runs its own 3. **Explicit coverage thresholds** - Fail CI below target, don't just report 4. **Deterministic tests** - Isolate shared state; use `--randomize` (Bun) to catch order bugs 5. **Mock at boundaries** - Network/FS/time, never internal implementation detail
---
Decision Guide
Choosing a runner? ├── Greenfield, Bun runtime, fast local TDD → bun test ├── Large suite / heavy CI parallelism → Vitest (multi-worker) ├── Migrating from Jest / need full coverage → Vitest (V8 + Istanbul) ├── Component/DOM in real browser → Vitest browser mode (Playwright) └── Zero-dependency script or CLI → bun test
→ See `references/choosing-runner.md` for the full matrix
---
Reference Guide
Concepts
| Topic | Reference | Load when | |-------|-----------|-----------| | Runner selection | `references/choosing-runner.md` | Deciding bun test vs Vitest | | Bun test runner | `references/bun-test.md` | Using `bun test` | | Vitest | `references/vitest.md` | Using Vitest | | Shared API | `references/common-patterns.md` | Writing describe/it/mock/snapshot |
Templates
| Template | Use Case | |----------|----------| | `references/templates/bun-setup.md` | bunfig.toml + first Bun tests | | `references/templates/vitest-setup.md` | vitest.config.ts + coverage + CI |
---
Quick Start
Bun
import { test, expect } from "bun:test";
test("2 + 2", () => {
expect(2 + 2).toBe(4);
});bun test --coverage
→ See `references/templates/bun-setup.md`
Vitest
import { test, expect } from "vitest";
test("adds 1 + 2", () => {
expect(1 + 2).toBe(3);
});npx vitest run --coverage
→ See `references/templates/vitest-setup.md`
---
Best Practices
DO
- Colocate tests as `*.test.ts` next to source
- Assert inside every `waitFor`/async block
- Set per-test timeouts for network-bound tests
DON'T
- Mix both runners in one package
- Rely on test execution order
- Ship experimental Bun coverage as the sole quality gate on huge suites
A plugin ecosystem that turns Claude Code into a supervised, multi-agent development environment.
Repo: fusengine/agents
Other skills on fusengine-agents.
- /agent-creator
Use when creating expert agents. Generates agent.md with frontmatter, hooks, required sections, and skill references.
Open skill - /apex-methodology
Use when starting ANY development task -- feature, bug fix, refactor, hotfix (triggers: implement, create, build, fix, add feature, refactor, develop).
Open skill - /brainstorming
Use when creating a feature/component or adding functionality. Fires BEFORE APEX Analyze to refine requirements via structured questioning.
Open skill - /challenge
Use before a root-cause, done/verified claim, irreversible action, or 2nd-time fix reaches the owner (APEX or plain conversation); also fires at every eLicit/Verify gate. Not for code correctness (use sniper).
Open skill - /code-quality
Use when validating code quality after modifications -- SOLID compliance, DRY duplication, linter errors, architecture violations. Do NOT use for functional verification (run verification FIRST, then code-quality).
Open skill - /elicitation
Use when an expert agent self-reviews and self-corrects code after the Execute phase, before sniper validation (BMAD-METHOD elicitation techniques).
Open skill

