Skip to content
Automation
Skill

/fin-sox-testing

Generate SOX sample selections, testing workpapers, and control assessments. Use when planning quarterly or annual SOX 404 testing, pulling a sample for a control (revenue, P2P, ITGC, close), building a testing workpaper template, or evaluating and classifying a control

From plugin
evo-nexus
549193 skills38 agents40 commands9 MCP

Claude Code

$ npx -y skills add evolution-foundation/evo-nexus --skill fin-sox-testing --agent claude-code

SKILL.md

fin-sox-testing.SKILL.md
name: fin-sox-testing
description: Generate SOX sample selections, testing workpapers, and control assessments. Use when planning quarterly or annual SOX 404 testing, pulling a sample for a control (revenue, P2P, ITGC, close), building a testing workpaper template, or evaluating and classifying a control deficiency.
argument-hint: "<control area> [period]"

SOX Compliance Testing

> If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see [CONNECTORS.md](../../CONNECTORS.md).

**Important**: This command assists with SOX compliance workflows but does not provide audit or legal advice. All testing workpapers and assessments should be reviewed by qualified financial professionals before use in audit documentation.

Generate sample selections, create testing workpapers, document control assessments, and provide testing templates for SOX 404 internal controls over financial reporting.

Usage

/sox <control-area> <period>

Arguments

  • `control-area` — The control area to test:
  • `revenue-recognition` — Revenue cycle controls (order-to-cash)
  • `procure-to-pay` or `p2p` — Procurement and AP controls (purchase-to-pay)
  • `payroll` — Payroll processing and compensation controls
  • `financial-close` — Period-end close and reporting controls
  • `treasury` — Cash management and treasury controls
  • `fixed-assets` — Capital asset lifecycle controls
  • `inventory` — Inventory valuation and management controls
  • `itgc` — IT general controls (access, change management, operations)
  • `entity-level` — Entity-level and monitoring controls
  • `journal-entries` — Journal entry processing controls
  • Any specific control ID or name
  • `period` — The testing period (e.g., `2024-Q4`, `2024`, `2024-H2`)

Workflow

1. Identify Controls to Test

Based on the control area, identify the key controls. Present the control matrix:

| Control # | Control Description | Type | Frequency | Key/Non-Key | Risk | Assertion | |-----------|-------------------|------|-----------|-------------|------|-----------| | [ID] | [Description] | Manual/Automated/IT-Dependent | Daily/Weekly/Monthly/Quarterly/Annual | Key | High/Medium/Low | [CEAVOP] |

**Control types:**

  • **Automated:** System-enforced controls with no manual intervention
  • **Manual:** Controls performed by personnel with judgment
  • **IT-dependent manual:** Manual controls that rely on system-generated data

**Assertions (CEAVOP):**

  • **C**ompleteness — All transactions are recorded
  • **E**xistence/Occurrence — Transactions actually occurred
  • **A**ccuracy — Amounts are correctly recorded
  • **V**aluation — Assets/liabilities are properly valued
  • **O**bligations/Rights — Entity has rights to assets, obligations for liabilities
  • **P**resentation/Disclosure — Properly classified and disclosed

2. Determine Sample Size

Calculate sample sizes based on control frequency and risk:

| Control Frequency | Population Size (approx.) | Recommended Sample | |------------------|--------------------------|-------------------| | Annual | 1 | 1 (test the instance) | | Quarterly | 4 | 2 | | Monthly | 12 | 2-4 (based on risk) | | Weekly | 52 | 5-15 (based on risk) | | Daily | ~250 | 20-40 (based on risk) | | Per-transaction | Varies | 25-60 (based on risk and volume) |

Adjust for:

  • **Risk level:** Higher risk controls require larger samples
  • **Prior year results:** Controls with prior deficiencies need larger samples
  • **Reliance:** Controls relied upon by external auditors may need larger samples

3. Generate Sample Selection

Select samples from the population using the appropriate method:

**Random selection** (default for transaction-level controls):

  • Generate random numbers to select specific items from the population
  • Ensure coverage across the full period

**Systematic selection** (for periodic controls):

  • Select items at fixed intervals with a random start point
  • Ensure representation across all sub-periods

**Targeted selection** (supplement to random, for risk-based testing):

  • Select items with specific risk characteristics (high dollar, unusual, period-end)
  • Document rationale for targeted selections

Present the sample:

SAMPLE SELECTION
Control: [Control ID] — [Description]
Period: [Testing period]
Population: [Count] items, $[Total value]
Sample size: [N] items
Selection method: [Random/Systematic/Targeted]

| Sample # | Transaction Date | Reference/ID | Amount | Selection Basis |
|----------|-----------------|--------------|--------|-----------------|
| 1        | [Date]          | [Ref]        | $X,XXX | Random          |
| 2        | [Date]          | [Ref]        | $X,XXX | Random          |
| ...      | ...             | ...          | ...    | ...             |

4. Create Testing Workpaper

Generate a testing template for each control:

SOX CONTROL TESTING WORKPAPER
==============================
Control #: [ID]
Control Description: [Full description of the control activity]
Control Owner: [Role/title — to be filled by tester]
Control Type: [Manual/Automated/IT-Dependent Manual]
Frequency: [How often the control operates]
Key Control: [Yes/No]
Relevant Assertion(s): [CEAVOP]
Testing Period: [Period]

TEST OBJECTIVE:
To determine whether [control description] operated effectively throughout the testing period.

TEST PROCEDURES:
1. [Step 1 — What to inspect, examine, or re-perform]
2. [Step 2 — What evidence to obtain]
3. [Step 3 — What to compare or verify]
4. [Step 4 — How to evaluate completeness of performance]
5. [Step 5 — How to assess timeliness of performance]

EXPECTED EVIDENCE:
- [Document type 1 — e.g., signed approval form]
- [Document type 2 — e.g., system screenshot showing review]
- [Document type 3 — e.g., reconciliation with preparer sign-off]

TEST RESULTS:

| Sampl
Read more
@evolution-foundation
Ships withevo-nexus

The open source operating system for AI-powered businesses

549193 skills38 agents9 MCP
Get the whole plugin

Stars on GitHub

Momentum

stars in total
549
Star history of evolution-foundation/evo-nexus on GitHub, a chart by star-history.com

Other skills on evo-nexus.

More skills from other plugins.

agent-builder

agent-builder

Load immediately after an Agent intent, before the first agent_builder_* call. Governs how you create, configure, test, and…

n8n12d209k
@n8n-io@n8n-ioInstall Skill
browser-use

browser-use

Direct browser control via CDP for web interaction: automation, scraping, testing, screenshots, and site/app work. Also covers…

@browser-use@browser-useInstall Skill
agent-browser

agent-browser

Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling…

@vercel-labs-2@vercel-labs-2Install Skill
add-anydoc

add-anydoc

Add local office-document-to-Markdown conversion to NanoClaw agent containers with the pinned Firecrawl AnyDoc CLI. Use when…

@nanocoai@nanocoaiInstall Skill

Questions about fin-sox-testing.

Which coding agents can use fin-sox-testing?
fin-sox-testing installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.