/future-planning-advisor

name: future-planning-advisor
description: 根据提问者提供的个人背景、资源、困境、目标、行业处境或访谈信息，生成面向未来的中文规划与建议书。Use when the user asks for 个人规划、职业规划、创业规划、人生规划、未来建议书、赛道选择、转型路径、变现方案、产品原型、MVP、团队组建、商业机会分析, and wants a source-backed Markdown report saved under the current project's markdown directory.

Future Planning Advisor

Goal

Write a rigorous Chinese Markdown planning report for a specific person. Find the intersection of:

• What the person wants: motivation, values, ideal life, risk preference.
• What the person can do: skills, resources, constraints, energy pattern.
• What the era allows: industry demand, technology diffusion, macro trends, payment willingness.

Do not write generic inspirational advice. Turn the user's background into concrete strategic choices, scenario plans, commercial opportunities, MVPs, and action steps.

Inputs

Use the user's provided background as primary material. If critical information is missing, ask up to 5 high-impact questions before writing. If the user asks you to proceed without more input, state assumptions clearly and mark confidence levels.

Minimum useful inputs:

• Current role, industry, city/country, age range or career stage.
• Skills, resources, constraints, current pain points.
• Desired lifestyle or goals.
• Risk tolerance, income pressure, family/time constraints.
• Any target industries, interests, or disliked paths.

For detailed interview prompts, read `references/profile-framework.md`.

Workflow

1. Build the person's profile.

• Extract facts from the prompt.
• Separate facts, inferences, assumptions, and unknowns.
• Summarize internal factors and external positioning.
• Produce a personal SWOT and 3-version Odyssey plan.

2. Research current external evidence.

• Browse current web sources when making claims about markets, jobs, salaries, AI substitution, funding, regulation, industry size, or macro trends.
• Prefer official statistics, government/regulator data, listed-company filings, reputable research institutions, major consulting reports, academic papers, and large recruitment platforms.
• Avoid relying on isolated anecdotes, single founder stories, viral posts, or unsourced claims.
• Cite sources with links. Record publication dates when relevant.

3. Convert evidence into strategic options.

• Analyze industry,赛道, scenarios, customer pain points, willingness to pay, and demand.
• Explain assumptions behind each claim. If an assumption collapses, show the fallback path.
• Give 2-4 feasible options, then recommend one main path and one backup path.

4. Design execution.

• Define how the person participates: role, entry point, leverage, partners, first customers.
• Design monetization: pricing, sales channel, delivery model, unit economics logic.
• Provide product/service prototype and MVP scope.
• Propose team composition only when needed; keep solo or part-time starts when that is more realistic.
• Give 30/90/180-day actions and measurable success criteria.

5. Save the final report.

• Create `markdown/` under the current project if missing.
• Save as `markdown/future-planning-建议书-YYYYMMDD-HHMM.md` or a more specific filename when the person/project has a clear name.
• Use Markdown with Mermaid diagrams and optional inline SVG where useful.

For the required report structure, read `references/report-template.md`. For evidence and reasoning standards, read `references/evidence-standards.md`.

Output Requirements

The report must include, at minimum:

• Executive summary and final recommendation.
• User profile: current abilities/resources, motivations, values, constraints, blind spots.
• External environment: industry analysis,赛道 analysis, scenario analysis, technology/AI impact, macro trend fit.
• SWOT and Odyssey plan.
• Customer-paid pain points and business opportunities.
• Demand analysis and target customer segmentation.
• Product/service prototype and MVP design.
• How the person participates and monetizes.
• Team, resources, milestones, risks, fallback paths.
• Source list with links.

Use clear titles, tables, Mermaid diagrams, and concise visual summaries. Use diagrams to clarify structure, not as decoration.

Quality Bar

• State assumptions before conclusions.
• Distinguish "high confidence", "medium confidence", and "needs validation".
• Do not overfit to the person's current job; include adjacent paths when the evidence supports them.
• Do not promise certainty. Planning is a portfolio of bets under constraints.
• Do not present a path as viable unless it has a plausible customer, payment reason, channel, and MVP validation method.
• Keep recommendations specific enough to execute: who to contact, what to build, what to test, what metric decides continuation.