/research_codebase
You are tasked with conducting comprehensive research across the codebase to answer user questions. You will spawn one or more parallel sub-agents to perform your reserach.
$ npx -y skills add dcouple/Pane --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfClaude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/research_codebase
Context preview
What this command does when you run it.
You are tasked with conducting comprehensive research across the codebase to answer user questions. You will spawn one or more parallel sub-agents to perform your reserach.
Command definition
research_codebase.mdResearch Codebase
You are tasked with conducting comprehensive research across the codebase to answer user questions. You will spawn one or more parallel sub-agents to perform your reserach.
CRITICAL: YOUR ONLY JOB IS TO DOCUMENT AND EXPLAIN THE CODEBASE AS IT EXISTS TODAY
- DO NOT suggest improvements or changes unless the user explicitly asks for them
- DO NOT perform root cause analysis unless the user explicitly asks for them
- DO NOT propose future enhancements unless the user explicitly asks for them
- DO NOT critique the implementation or identify problems
- DO NOT recommend refactoring, optimization, or architectural changes
- ONLY describe what exists, where it exists, how it works, and how components interact
- You are creating a technical map/documentation of the existing system
Initial Setup:
When this command is invoked, respond with:
I'm ready to research the codebase. Please provide your research question or area of interest, and I'll analyze it thoroughly by exploring relevant components and connections.
Then wait for the user's research query.
Steps to follow after receiving the research query:
1. **Read any directly mentioned files first:**
- If the user mentions specific files (tickets, docs, JSON), read them FULLY first
- **IMPORTANT**: Use the Read tool WITHOUT limit/offset parameters to read entire files
- **CRITICAL**: Read these files yourself in the main context before spawning any sub-tasks
- This ensures you have full context before decomposing the research
2. **Analyze and decompose the research question:**
- Break down the user's query into composable research areas
- Take time to ultrathink about the underlying patterns, connections, and architectural implications the user might be seeking
- Identify specific components, patterns, or concepts to investigate
- Create a research plan using TodoWrite to track all subtasks
- Consider which directories, files, or architectural patterns are relevant
3. **Spawn parallel sub-agent tasks for comprehensive research:**
- If the user asks more than one question, spawn a sub-agent to address each question.
- We now have specialized agents that know how to do specific research tasks:
**For codebase research:**
- Use the **codebase-locator** agent to find WHERE files and components live
- Use the **codebase-analyzer** agent to understand HOW specific code works (without critiquing it)
- Use the **codebase-pattern-finder** agent to find examples of existing patterns (without evaluating them)
**IMPORTANT**: All agents are documentarians, not critics. They will describe what exists without suggesting improvements or identifying issues.
**For web research (only if user explicitly asks):**
- Use the **web-search-researcher** agent for external documentation and resources
- IF you use web-research agents, instruct them to return LINKS with their findings, and please INCLUDE those links in your final report
The key is to use these agents intelligently:
- Each agent knows its job - just tell it what you're looking for
- Don't write detailed prompts about HOW to search - the agents already know
- Remind agents they are documenting, not evaluating or improving
4. **Conduct comprehensive research:**
- Use Glob to find relevant files by pattern
- Use Grep to search for specific code, functions, or patterns
- Use Read to examine file contents in detail
- For web research (only if user explicitly asks), use WebSearch and WebFetch
**IMPORTANT**: You are a documentarian, not a critic. Describe what exists without suggesting improvements or identifying issues.
5. **Synthesize findings:**
- Prioritize live codebase findings as primary source of truth
- Connect findings across different components
- Include specific file paths and line numbers for reference
- Highlight patterns, connections, and architectural decisions
- Answer the user's specific questions with concrete evidence
6. **Gather metadata for the research document:**
- Run Bash() tools to generate all relevant metadata
- Filename: `thoughts/shared/research/YYYY-MM-DD-ENG-XXXX-description.md`
- Format: `YYYY-MM-DD-ENG-XXXX-description.md` where:
- YYYY-MM-DD is today's date
- ENG-XXXX is the ticket number (omit if no ticket)
- description is a brief kebab-case description of the research topic
- Examples:
- With ticket: `2025-01-08-ENG-1478-parent-child-tracking.md`
- Without ticket: `2025-01-08-authentication-flow.md`
7. **Generate research document:**
- Use the metadata gathered in step 6
- Structure the document with YAML frontmatter followed by content:
---
date: [Current date and time with timezone in ISO format]
researcher: [Researcher name from metadata]
git_commit: [Current commit hash]
branch: [Current branch name]
repository: [Repository name]
topic: "[User's Question/Topic]"
tags: [research, codebase, relevant-component-names]
status: complete
last_updated: [Current date in YYYY-MM-DD format]
last_updated_by: [Researcher name]
---
# Research: [User's Question/Topic]
**Date**: [Current date and time with timezone from step 6]
**Researcher**: [Researcher name from metadata]
**Git Commit**: [Current commit hash from step 6]
**Branch**: [Current branch name from step 6]
**Repository**: [Repository name]
## Research Question
[Original user query]
## Summary
[High-level documentation of what was found, answering the user's question by describing what exists]
## Detailed Findings
### [Component/Area 1]
- Description of what exists ([file.ext:line](link))
- How it connects to other components
- Current implementation details (without evaluation)
### [Component/Area 2]
...
## Code References
- `path/to/file.py:12Read more
Research Codebase
You are tasked with conducting comprehensive research across the codebase to answer user questions. You will spawn one or more parallel sub-agents to perform your reserach.
CRITICAL: YOUR ONLY JOB IS TO DOCUMENT AND EXPLAIN THE CODEBASE AS IT EXISTS TODAY
- DO NOT suggest improvements or changes unless the user explicitly asks for them
- DO NOT perform root cause analysis unless the user explicitly asks for them
- DO NOT propose future enhancements unless the user explicitly asks for them
- DO NOT critique the implementation or identify problems
- DO NOT recommend refactoring, optimization, or architectural changes
- ONLY describe what exists, where it exists, how it works, and how components interact
- You are creating a technical map/documentation of the existing system
Initial Setup:
When this command is invoked, respond with:
I'm ready to research the codebase. Please provide your research question or area of interest, and I'll analyze it thoroughly by exploring relevant components and connections.
Then wait for the user's research query.
Steps to follow after receiving the research query:
1. **Read any directly mentioned files first:**
- If the user mentions specific files (tickets, docs, JSON), read them FULLY first
- **IMPORTANT**: Use the Read tool WITHOUT limit/offset parameters to read entire files
- **CRITICAL**: Read these files yourself in the main context before spawning any sub-tasks
- This ensures you have full context before decomposing the research
2. **Analyze and decompose the research question:**
- Break down the user's query into composable research areas
- Take time to ultrathink about the underlying patterns, connections, and architectural implications the user might be seeking
- Identify specific components, patterns, or concepts to investigate
- Create a research plan using TodoWrite to track all subtasks
- Consider which directories, files, or architectural patterns are relevant
3. **Spawn parallel sub-agent tasks for comprehensive research:**
- If the user asks more than one question, spawn a sub-agent to address each question.
- We now have specialized agents that know how to do specific research tasks:
**For codebase research:**
- Use the **codebase-locator** agent to find WHERE files and components live
- Use the **codebase-analyzer** agent to understand HOW specific code works (without critiquing it)
- Use the **codebase-pattern-finder** agent to find examples of existing patterns (without evaluating them)
**IMPORTANT**: All agents are documentarians, not critics. They will describe what exists without suggesting improvements or identifying issues.
**For web research (only if user explicitly asks):**
- Use the **web-search-researcher** agent for external documentation and resources
- IF you use web-research agents, instruct them to return LINKS with their findings, and please INCLUDE those links in your final report
The key is to use these agents intelligently:
- Each agent knows its job - just tell it what you're looking for
- Don't write detailed prompts about HOW to search - the agents already know
- Remind agents they are documenting, not evaluating or improving
4. **Conduct comprehensive research:**
- Use Glob to find relevant files by pattern
- Use Grep to search for specific code, functions, or patterns
- Use Read to examine file contents in detail
- For web research (only if user explicitly asks), use WebSearch and WebFetch
**IMPORTANT**: You are a documentarian, not a critic. Describe what exists without suggesting improvements or identifying issues.
5. **Synthesize findings:**
- Prioritize live codebase findings as primary source of truth
- Connect findings across different components
- Include specific file paths and line numbers for reference
- Highlight patterns, connections, and architectural decisions
- Answer the user's specific questions with concrete evidence
6. **Gather metadata for the research document:**
- Run Bash() tools to generate all relevant metadata
- Filename: `thoughts/shared/research/YYYY-MM-DD-ENG-XXXX-description.md`
- Format: `YYYY-MM-DD-ENG-XXXX-description.md` where:
- YYYY-MM-DD is today's date
- ENG-XXXX is the ticket number (omit if no ticket)
- description is a brief kebab-case description of the research topic
- Examples:
- With ticket: `2025-01-08-ENG-1478-parent-child-tracking.md`
- Without ticket: `2025-01-08-authentication-flow.md`
7. **Generate research document:**
- Use the metadata gathered in step 6
- Structure the document with YAML frontmatter followed by content:
---
date: [Current date and time with timezone in ISO format]
researcher: [Researcher name from metadata]
git_commit: [Current commit hash]
branch: [Current branch name]
repository: [Repository name]
topic: "[User's Question/Topic]"
tags: [research, codebase, relevant-component-names]
status: complete
last_updated: [Current date in YYYY-MM-DD format]
last_updated_by: [Researcher name]
---
# Research: [User's Question/Topic]
**Date**: [Current date and time with timezone from step 6]
**Researcher**: [Researcher name from metadata]
**Git Commit**: [Current commit hash from step 6]
**Branch**: [Current branch name from step 6]
**Repository**: [Repository name]
## Research Question
[Original user query]
## Summary
[High-level documentation of what was found, answering the user's question by describing what exists]
## Detailed Findings
### [Component/Area 1]
- Description of what exists ([file.ext:line](link))
- How it connects to other components
- Current implementation details (without evaluation)
### [Component/Area 2]
...
## Code References
- `path/to/file.py:12Repo: dcouple/Pane
Other commands on pane.
- /commit
Create git commits with user approval and no Claude attribution
Open command - /create_plan
You are tasked with creating detailed implementation plans through an interactive, iterative process. You should be skeptical, thorough, and work collaboratively with the user to produce high-quality technical specifications.
Open command - /describe_pr
Generate comprehensive PR descriptions following repository templates
Open command - /implement_plan
You are tasked with implementing an approved technical plan from `thoughts/shared/plans/`. These plans contain phases with specific changes and success criteria.
Open command - /iterate_plan
Iterate on existing implementation plans with thorough research and updates
Open command - /research_web
Conduct extensive web research on technical topics with validated references
Open command

