/go-generics

name: go-generics
description: Use when deciding whether to use Go generics, writing generic functions or types, choosing constraints, or picking between type aliases and type definitions. Also use when a user is writing a utility function that could work with multiple types, even if they don't mention generics explicitly. Does not cover interface design without generics (see go-interfaces).

Go Generics and Type Parameters

> Compatibility: Generics require Go 1.18+.

Resource Routing

• `references/CONSTRAINTS.md` - Read when composing constraints, using type sets, or choosing between generics and interfaces.

When to Use Generics

Start with concrete types. Generalize only when a second type appears.

Prefer Generics When

• Multiple types share identical logic (sorting, filtering, map/reduce)
• You would otherwise rely on `any` and excessive type switching
• You are building a reusable data structure (concurrent-safe set, ordered map)

Avoid Generics When

• Only one type is being instantiated in practice
• Interfaces already model the shared behavior cleanly
• The generic code is harder to read than the type-specific alternative

> "Write code, don't design types." — Robert Griesemer and Ian Lance Taylor

Decision Flow

Do multiple types share identical logic?
├─ No  → Use concrete types
├─ Yes → Do they share a useful interface?
│        ├─ Yes → Use an interface
│        └─ No  → Use generics

**Bad:**

// Premature generics: only ever called with int
func Sum[T constraints.Integer | constraints.Float](vals []T) T {
    var total T
    for _, v := range vals {
        total += v
    }
    return total
}

**Good:**

func SumInts(vals []int) int {
    var total int
    for _, v := range vals {
        total += v
    }
    return total
}

---

Type Parameter Naming

| Name | Typical Use | |------|-------------| | `T` | General type parameter | | `K` | Map key type | | `V` | Map value type | | `E` | Element/item type |

For complex constraints, a short descriptive name is acceptable:

func Marshal[Opts encoding.MarshalOptions](v any, opts Opts) ([]byte, error)

---

Type Aliases vs Type Definitions

Type aliases (`type Old = new.Name`) are rare — use only for package migration or gradual API refactoring.

---

Constraint Composition

Combine constraints with `~` (underlying type) and `|` (union):

type Numeric interface {
    ~int | ~int8 | ~int16 | ~int32 | ~int64 |
    ~float32 | ~float64
}

func Sum[T Numeric](vals []T) T {
    var total T
    for _, v := range vals {
        total += v
    }
    return total
}

Use the `constraints` package or `cmp` package (Go 1.21+) for standard constraints like `cmp.Ordered` instead of writing your own.

---

Common Pitfalls

Don't Wrap Standard Library Types

// Bad: generic wrapper adds complexity without value
type Set[T comparable] struct {
    m map[T]struct{}
}

// Better: use map[T]struct{} directly when the usage is simple
seen := map[string]struct{}{}

Generics justify their complexity when they eliminate duplication across **multiple call sites**. A single-use generic is just indirection.

Don't Use Generics for Interface Satisfaction

// Bad: T is only used to satisfy an interface — just use the interface
func Process[T io.Reader](r T) error { ... }

// Good: accept the interface directly
func Process(r io.Reader) error { ... }

Avoid Over-Constraining

// Bad: constraint is more restrictive than needed
func Contains[T interface{ ~int | ~string }](slice []T, target T) bool { ... }

// Good: comparable is sufficient
func Contains[T comparable](slice []T, target T) bool { ... }

---

Quick Reference

| Topic | Guidance | |-------|----------| | When to use generics | Only when multiple types share identical logic and interfaces don't suffice | | Starting point | Write concrete code first; generalize later | | Naming | Single uppercase letter (`T`, `K`, `V`, `E`) | | Type aliases | Same type, alternate name; use only for migration | | Constraint composition | Use `~` for underlying types, `|` for unions; prefer `cmp.Ordered` over custom | | Common pitfall | Don't genericize single-use code or when interfaces suffice |

---

Related Skills

• **Interfaces vs generics**: See [go-interfaces](../go-interfaces/SKILL.md) when deciding whether an interface already models the shared behavior without generics
• **Type declarations**: See [go-declarations](../go-declarations/SKILL.md) when defining new types, type aliases, or choosing between type definitions and aliases
• **Documenting generic APIs**: See [go-documentation](../go-documentation/SKILL.md) when writing doc comments and runnable examples for generic functions
• **Naming type parameters**: See [go-naming](../go-naming/SKILL.md) when choosing names for type parameters or constraint interfaces