account-research
Research a company or person and get actionable sales intel. Works standalone with web search, supercharged when you connect…
\"Analyze financial health using ratio categories: profitability, liquidity, leverage, efficiency, and valuation. Use this skill when the user needs to assess a company's financial performance, compare companies, evaluate creditworthiness, or prepare financial due diligence —
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill --skill biz-financial-ratios --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill --skill biz-financial-ratios -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill --skill biz-financial-ratios -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill --skill biz-financial-ratios -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill --skill biz-financial-ratios -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill --skill biz-financial-ratios -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill --skill biz-financial-ratios -a windsurf -y
name: "\"biz-financial-ratios\"" description: "\"Analyze financial health using ratio categories: profitability, liquidity, leverage, efficiency, and valuation. Use this skill when the user needs to assess a company's financial performance, compare companies, evaluate creditworthiness, or prepare financial due diligence — even if they say 'is this company financially healthy', 'analyze these financial statements', or 'compare these two companies'.\"." allowed-tools: Bash, Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep
Financial ratio analysis transforms raw financial statements into comparable metrics across five categories. Ratios are meaningful only in context — compare against industry benchmarks, historical trends, and peer companies.
**Trigger conditions:**
**When NOT to use:**
IRON LAW: Ratios Without Context Are Meaningless A current ratio of 1.5 means nothing alone. Is 1.5 good? Compare to: 1. Industry average (retail ~1.2, manufacturing ~1.8) 2. Company's own trend (was it 2.0 last year? → declining liquidity) 3. Peers (competitor has 2.5? → relatively weak) NEVER report a ratio without at least one comparison point.
IRON LAW: All Five Categories, Every Time Analyzing only profitability misses a leveraged company about to default. Analyzing only liquidity misses a profitable company's growth potential. Cover all five categories for a complete picture.
**1. Profitability** — Is the company making money? | Ratio | Formula | Measures | |-------|---------|----------| | Gross Margin | (Revenue - COGS) / Revenue | Production efficiency | | Operating Margin | EBIT / Revenue | Core business profitability | | Net Margin | Net Income / Revenue | Bottom-line profitability | | ROE | Net Income / Equity | Return to shareholders | | ROA | Net Income / Total Assets | Asset productivity |
**2. Liquidity** — Can it pay short-term obligations? | Ratio | Formula | Healthy | |-------|---------|---------| | Current Ratio | Current Assets / Current Liabilities | > 1.5 | | Quick Ratio | (Current Assets - Inventory) / Current Liabilities | > 1.0 | | Cash Ratio | Cash / Current Liabilities | Context-dependent |
**3. Leverage** — How much debt is used? | Ratio | Formula | Measures | |-------|---------|----------| | Debt-to-Equity | Total Liabilities / Equity | Capital structure | | Interest Coverage | EBIT / Interest Expense | Ability to service debt | | Debt-to-Assets | Total Liabilities / Total Assets | Asset financing |
> ⚠️ **"Debt" definition**: This skill (and the bundled script) defines "Debt" in the > leverage ratios as **Total Liabilities** — not "long-term debt only" or "interest-bearing > debt only". Both alternative definitions exist in textbooks and produce materially > different ratios. If you need a different definition, document the choice explicitly > and compute it manually; do not silently substitute.
**4. Efficiency** — How well are assets used? | Ratio | Formula | Measures | |-------|---------|----------| | Inventory Turnover | COGS / Avg Inventory | Inventory management | | Receivables Turnover | Revenue / Avg Receivables | Collection speed | | Asset Turnover | Revenue / Total Assets | Asset productivity | | Cash Conversion Cycle | DIO + DSO - DPO | Cash cycle speed |
**5. Valuation** — Is the stock fairly priced? | Ratio | Formula | Measures | |-------|---------|----------| | P/E | Price / EPS | Price vs earnings | | EV/EBITDA | Enterprise Value / EBITDA | Price vs cash generation | | P/B | Price / Book Value per Share | Price vs net assets | | Dividend Yield | Dividend per Share / Price | Income return |
1. **Calculate** all relevant ratios from financial statements 2. **Compare** against industry benchmarks and 3-year trend 3. **Identify** red flags (declining trends, outliers vs peers) 4. **Synthesize** a financial health verdict across all five categories 5. **Recommend** actions based on weak areas
> ⚠️ **Decimal vs percent**: The bundled script returns all profitability ratios > (`gross_margin`, `operating_margin`, `net_margin`, `roa`, `roe`) as **decimals** — > `0.35` means 35%, NOT `35.0`. Liquidity and leverage ratios are already unitless > multiples (e.g. `current_ratio: 2.125`). Render percentages only in the human-facing > markdown report, never in JSON outputs.
# Financial Ratio Analysis: {Company}
## Summary Dashboard
| Category | Status | Key Metric |
|----------|--------|-----------|
| Profitability | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | {headline ratio} |
| Liquidity | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | {headline ratio} |
| Leverage | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | {headline ratio} |
| Efficiency | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | {headline ratio} |
| Valuation | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | {headline ratio} |
## Detailed Ratios
{Tables per category with ratio, value, industry avg, trend}
## Red Flags
- {specific concern with data}
## Overall Assessment
{Synthesized financial health verdict}**Scenario:** Ratio analysis for a Taiwanese electronics manufacturer
| Ratio | Company | Industry | Trend | Flag | |-------|---------|----------|-------|------| | Gross Margin | 18% | 22% | ↓ from 21% | 🔴 Below peers, declining | | Current Ratio | 1.8 | 1.5 | → stable | 🟢 Adequate | | D/E | 1.2 | 0.8 | ↑ from 0.9 | 🟡 Rising leverage | | Inventory Turnover | 4.2x | 6.0x | ↓ from 5.1x | 🔴 Slow inventory |
Synthesis: Profitability weakening + inventory building up + leverage rising = potential working capital crisis ahead ✓
Curated skill pack for LLM agents in engineer and science workflow (Cursor & Claude ready).
Research a company or person and get actionable sales intel. Works standalone with web search, supercharged when you connect…
Evaluate LLM agents and tool-using workflows—task success, tool accuracy, latency/cost, safety, and regression suites. Use when…
Design agent tools and CLI surfaces—schemas, naming, errors, idempotency, and discoverability for LLM callers. Use when defining…
\"Implement and select ad bidding strategies from manual CPC to automated target-CPA and target-ROAS. Use this skill when the…
\"Optimize advertising budget allocation across campaigns using marginal returns analysis. Use this skill when the user needs to…
\"Build CTR prediction models for estimating ad click-through rates from features. Use this skill when the user needs to predict…
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.