Skip to content
Development
Skill

/biz-cac-ltv

\"Calculate and analyze Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) and Customer Lifetime Value (LTV) to evaluate unit economics and marketing efficiency. Use this skill when the user needs to assess whether their customer acquisition is profitable, optimize marketing spend allocation, or

From plugin
awesome-agent-skill
26200 skills4 commands
Install
$ npx -y skills add charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill --skill biz-cac-ltv --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/biz-cac-ltv

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

\"Calculate and analyze Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) and Customer Lifetime Value (LTV) to evaluate unit economics and marketing efficiency. Use this skill when the user needs to assess whether their customer acquisition is profitable, optimize marketing spend allocation, or

SKILL.md

biz-cac-ltv.SKILL.md
name: "\"biz-cac-ltv\""
description: "\"Calculate and analyze Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) and Customer Lifetime Value (LTV) to evaluate unit economics and marketing efficiency. Use this skill when the user needs to assess whether their customer acquisition is profitable, optimize marketing spend allocation, or evaluate business model viability — even if they say 'are we spending too much on ads', 'what's each customer worth', or 'is our growth sustainable'.\"."
allowed-tools: Bash, Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep

CAC and LTV Analysis

Overview

CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) and LTV (Customer Lifetime Value) are the two fundamental unit economics metrics. Together they answer: "Does each customer generate more revenue than it costs to acquire them?" The LTV:CAC ratio is the single most important indicator of marketing efficiency and business model viability.

When to Use

**Trigger conditions:**

  • User evaluating marketing spend efficiency
  • User asks "what's each customer worth?" or "are we spending too much on marketing?"
  • User assessing business model viability or fundraising metrics
  • User needs to allocate budget across acquisition channels

**When NOT to use:**

  • For product pricing decisions → use Pricing Strategy
  • For customer segmentation → use STP or RFM
  • For comprehensive financial analysis → use financial ratios

Framework

IRON LAW: LTV:CAC > 3 for Healthy Business

LTV:CAC ratio must be at least 3:1 for sustainable businesses.
- < 1:1 = You're LOSING money on every customer
- 1-3:1 = Unsustainable unless you can reduce CAC or increase LTV
- 3-5:1 = Healthy
- > 5:1 = Potentially underinvesting in growth (leaving market share on the table)

This ratio applies to the BLENDED average. Individual channels can be
below 3:1 if the overall blend exceeds it.
IRON LAW: CAC Must Include ALL Acquisition Costs

CAC = Total marketing & sales spend / Number of new customers acquired

"Total spend" includes: ad spend, marketing team salaries, sales team
salaries, tools, content production, events — EVERYTHING spent to acquire
customers in that period. Excluding salaries or tools understates true CAC.

Step 1: Calculate CAC

**Basic formula:**

CAC = Total acquisition spend in period / New customers acquired in period

**By channel:**

CAC (Channel X) = Spend on Channel X / Customers from Channel X

Include in total acquisition spend:

  • Advertising (digital + offline)
  • Marketing team compensation
  • Sales team compensation (for B2B)
  • Marketing tools and software
  • Content production costs
  • Events and sponsorships
  • Agency fees

Step 2: Calculate LTV

**Simple formula:**

LTV = ARPU × Gross Margin % × Average Customer Lifespan

Where:

  • **ARPU** = Average Revenue Per User per period (monthly or annual)
  • **Gross Margin %** = (Revenue - COGS) / Revenue
  • **Average Customer Lifespan** = 1 / Churn Rate

**Cohort-based (more accurate):** Track actual revenue per customer cohort over time. Sum cumulative revenue per customer, apply gross margin.

Step 3: Calculate Key Ratios

| Metric | Formula | Healthy Benchmark | |--------|---------|-------------------| | **LTV:CAC** | LTV / CAC | > 3:1 | | **Payback Period** | CAC / (ARPU × Gross Margin) | < 12 months | | **CAC % of LTV** | CAC / LTV × 100 | < 33% |

Step 4: Segment Analysis

Calculate CAC and LTV by:

  • **Channel**: Which acquisition channels are most efficient?
  • **Customer segment**: Which segments have highest LTV:CAC?
  • **Cohort**: Is LTV improving or degrading over time?

Step 5: Optimization Strategies

**To reduce CAC:**

  • Shift budget to lower-CAC channels
  • Improve conversion rates (better landing pages, sales process)
  • Increase organic/referral acquisition (content, word-of-mouth)

**To increase LTV:**

  • Reduce churn (improve product, customer success)
  • Increase ARPU (upsell, cross-sell, price increases)
  • Extend customer lifespan (loyalty programs, switching costs)

Output Format

# CAC-LTV Analysis: {Company/Product}

## Unit Economics Summary

| Metric | Value | Benchmark | Status |
|--------|-------|-----------|--------|
| CAC (blended) | ${X} | — | — |
| LTV | ${X} | — | — |
| LTV:CAC | {X}:1 | > 3:1 | ✓/✗ |
| Payback Period | {X} months | < 12 months | ✓/✗ |

## CAC by Channel

| Channel | Spend | Customers | CAC | % of Total |
|---------|-------|-----------|-----|-----------|
| {channel} | ${X} | {N} | ${X} | {X%} |

## LTV Calculation

- ARPU: ${X}/month
- Gross Margin: {X%}
- Avg Lifespan: {X} months (churn rate: {X%}/month)
- LTV = ${X}

## LTV:CAC by Segment

| Segment | CAC | LTV | Ratio | Action |
|---------|-----|-----|-------|--------|
| {seg A} | ${X} | ${X} | {X}:1 | Invest / Maintain / Cut |

## Optimization Recommendations
1. ...
2. ...

Examples

Correct Application

**Scenario:** CAC-LTV for a Taiwanese B2C subscription box (monthly NT$599)

**CAC calculation:** | Item | Monthly Spend | |------|-------------| | Facebook/Instagram ads | NT$200,000 | | Google Ads | NT$80,000 | | KOL partnerships | NT$50,000 | | Marketing team (2 people) | NT$120,000 | | **Total** | **NT$450,000** |

New customers in month: 300 **CAC = NT$450,000 / 300 = NT$1,500**

**LTV calculation:**

  • ARPU: NT$599/month
  • Gross Margin: 55%
  • Monthly churn: 8% → Avg lifespan: 1/0.08 = 12.5 months
  • **LTV = NT$599 × 0.55 × 12.5 = NT$4,118**

**LTV:CAC = 4,118 / 1,500 = 2.75:1** — Below the 3:1 threshold. Need to either reduce CAC or improve retention.

Incorrect Application

**What went wrong:**

  • CAC calculated as "ad spend / new customers" only, excluding NT$120K/month marketing team salary → True CAC is NT$1,500, not NT$1,100. Violates Iron Law: include ALL acquisition costs.
  • LTV:CAC of 1.8:1 reported as "good because we're growing" → Growth at LTV:CAC < 3:1 means you're growing into larger losses. Violates Iron Law: ratio must be > 3:1.

Gotchas

  • **Attribution is messy**: A customer who saw an Instagram ad, Googled your
Read more
Ships withawesome-agent-skill

Curated skill pack for LLM agents in engineer and science workflow (Cursor & Claude ready).

Get the whole plugin

Other skills on awesome-agent-skill.