/review-code

Code Review

Inputs

• Plan file (plan.json)
• Git diff or modified files list
• Test results (if available)

Dimensions

| Dimension | Critical Issues | |-----------|----------------| | Quality | Empty catch, any casts, @ts-ignore, console.log | | Security | Hardcoded secrets, SQL injection, eval/exec, innerHTML | | Architecture | Circular deps, imports >2 levels deep, files >500 lines | | Requirements | Missing core functionality, incomplete acceptance criteria |

Review Process

1. Gather modified files from executor's state (team_msg get_state) 2. Read each modified file 3. Score per dimension (0-100%) 4. Classify issues by severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low) 5. Generate verdict (BLOCK/CONDITIONAL/APPROVE)

Output

Write review report to {run_dir}/outputs/review-report.md:

• Per-dimension scores
• Issue list with file:line references
• Verdict with justification
• Recommendations (if CONDITIONAL)