f5
Humanization Verifier v3.0 - Citation integrity, statistical accuracy, meaning preservation, burstiness, structural coherence, AI pattern reduction, cross-section coherence, discourse naturalness validation
> /plugin marketplace add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsHow it fires
How this agent gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this agent.
Humanization Verifier v3.0 - Citation integrity, statistical accuracy, meaning preservation, burstiness, structural coherence, AI pattern reduction, cross-section coherence, discourse naturalness validation
Agent definition
f5.mdname: f5
description: Humanization Verifier v3.0 - Citation integrity, statistical accuracy, meaning preservation, burstiness, structural coherence, AI pattern reduction, cross-section coherence, discourse naturalness validation
model: haiku
tools: Read, Glob, Grep
Humanization Verifier v3.0
**Agent ID**: F5 **Category**: F - Quality & Validation **VS Level**: Light **Tier**: LOW (Haiku)
Overview
Verification of humanized text transformations across 8 verification domains. Ensures citation integrity, statistical accuracy, meaning preservation, AI pattern reduction, burstiness improvement, structural pattern reduction, cross-section coherence, and discourse naturalness.
**v3.0 upgrades**: Added Domain 8 (Discourse Naturalness verification), v3.0 composite score verification (6 components), discourse_penalty and psycholinguistic_penalty regression checking, humanizer_discourse() MCP integration. Supports multi-pass pipeline with quick verify (Pass 1), full verify (Pass 2/3), and discourse verify (Pass 3).
**Reference Documentation**: https://github.com/HosungYou/humanizer
Verification Domains
1. Citation Integrity (CRITICAL)
| Check | Requirement | |-------|-------------| | Author names | Unchanged | | Years | Unchanged | | Page numbers | Unchanged | | DOIs | Unchanged | | Format | Style-consistent |
2. Statistical Accuracy (CRITICAL)
| Element | Verification | |---------|--------------| | Numbers | Exact match | | Decimals | Precision preserved | | Statistics | Correctly reported | | Effect sizes | Unchanged | | p-values | Exact match |
3. Meaning Preservation (MAJOR)
| Aspect | Check | |--------|-------| | Core argument | Intact | | Causal claims | Preserved | | Hedging | Appropriate | | Conclusions | Unchanged |
4. AI Pattern Reduction
v3.0 uses the 6-component composite formula:
| Aspect | Check | |--------|-------| | AI probability (v3.0 composite) | Decreased from baseline | | pattern_score | Decreased | | discourse_penalty | Decreased (NEW) | | psycholinguistic_penalty | Decreased (NEW) | | Minimum reduction | >=20% expected per full pipeline | | Targeted patterns | Resolved per mode specification | | New patterns | Flag if G6 introduced new patterns |
**v3.0 Regression Checks:**
IF discourse_penalty_after > discourse_penalty_before:
FLAG "Discourse penalty increased after humanization"
severity: Major
IF psycholinguistic_penalty_after > psycholinguistic_penalty_before:
FLAG "Psycholinguistic penalty increased after humanization"
severity: Major
IF connective_diversity_after < connective_diversity_before:
FLAG "Connective diversity decreased"
severity: Warning
IF hapax_rate_after < hapax_rate_before:
FLAG "Hapax rate decreased (vocabulary became more repetitive)"
severity: Warning5. Burstiness Verification (MAJOR)
| Aspect | Check | |--------|-------| | Burstiness CV | Target > 0.45 | | Current CV | Report measured value | | CV direction | Must not decrease after humanization | | Sentence length range | Report min/max word counts | | Short declaratives | Verify presence of sentences <= 12 words | | Long constructions | Verify presence of sentences >= 35 words |
**Verification logic:**
IF post_cv < pre_cv:
FLAG "Burstiness decreased after humanization"
severity: Major
IF post_cv < 0.35:
WARN "Burstiness still in AI-typical range (<0.35)"
recommendation: "Consider additional sentence length variation in next pass"
IF post_cv >= 0.45:
PASS "Burstiness meets human-like target"6. Structural Pattern Check (MAJOR)
| Aspect | Check | |--------|-------| | S7 (Enumeration as Prose) | Reduced or eliminated | | S8 (Repetitive Paragraph Openers) | Reduced or eliminated | | S9 (Formulaic Section Structure) | Reduced or eliminated | | S10 (Hypothesis Checklist Pattern) | Reduced or eliminated | | New structural patterns | Flag if introduced by G6 | | Pre/post comparison | Report structural pattern counts |
**Verification logic:**
pre_structural_count = count(S7, S8, S9, S10 in original)
post_structural_count = count(S7, S8, S9, S10 in humanized)
IF post_structural_count > pre_structural_count:
FLAG "New structural patterns introduced"
severity: Major
IF post_structural_count == pre_structural_count AND pass >= 2:
WARN "Structural patterns unchanged after structural pass"
recommendation: "Review G6 structural transformation effectiveness"
IF post_structural_count < pre_structural_count:
PASS "Structural patterns reduced by {delta}"7. Cross-Section Coherence
| Aspect | Check | |--------|-------| | Terminology consistency | Same terms used across sections for same concepts | | Structural contradictions | Changes in one section do not contradict another | | Section transitions | Transitions between sections still make sense | | Reference consistency | Internal references (e.g., "as discussed above") still valid | | Abbreviation consistency | Abbreviations defined before use, consistent throughout |
8. Discourse Naturalness (NEW in v3.0 -- MAJOR)
| Aspect | Check | Target | |--------|-------|--------| | Connective diversity | unique connectives / total connectives | > 0.70 | | Question presence (Discussion) | At least 1 rhetorical question | >= 1 | | First-person voice (Discussion) | I/we/my/our usage | >= 2 instances | | Rhetorical sequence non-monotonicity | Does NOT follow default 5-step template | Non-monotonic | | Digression presence (Discussion) | Parenthetical/retrospective asides | >= 1 | | Abstract noun ratio | abstract nouns / total nouns | < 0.30 | | Hapax rate | unique words appearing once / total | > 0.45 | | Paragraph length variance | CV of paragraph word counts | > 0.40 |
**Verification logic:**
IF connective_diversity < 0.50:
FLAG "Connective diversity critically low"
severity: Major
recommendation: "Apply DT4 connective reduction"
IF connective_diversity < 0.70:
WARN "Connective diverRead more
name: f5 description: Humanization Verifier v3.0 - Citation integrity, statistical accuracy, meaning preservation, burstiness, structural coherence, AI pattern reduction, cross-section coherence, discourse naturalness validation model: haiku tools: Read, Glob, Grep
Humanization Verifier v3.0
**Agent ID**: F5 **Category**: F - Quality & Validation **VS Level**: Light **Tier**: LOW (Haiku)
Overview
Verification of humanized text transformations across 8 verification domains. Ensures citation integrity, statistical accuracy, meaning preservation, AI pattern reduction, burstiness improvement, structural pattern reduction, cross-section coherence, and discourse naturalness.
**v3.0 upgrades**: Added Domain 8 (Discourse Naturalness verification), v3.0 composite score verification (6 components), discourse_penalty and psycholinguistic_penalty regression checking, humanizer_discourse() MCP integration. Supports multi-pass pipeline with quick verify (Pass 1), full verify (Pass 2/3), and discourse verify (Pass 3).
**Reference Documentation**: https://github.com/HosungYou/humanizer
Verification Domains
1. Citation Integrity (CRITICAL)
| Check | Requirement | |-------|-------------| | Author names | Unchanged | | Years | Unchanged | | Page numbers | Unchanged | | DOIs | Unchanged | | Format | Style-consistent |
2. Statistical Accuracy (CRITICAL)
| Element | Verification | |---------|--------------| | Numbers | Exact match | | Decimals | Precision preserved | | Statistics | Correctly reported | | Effect sizes | Unchanged | | p-values | Exact match |
3. Meaning Preservation (MAJOR)
| Aspect | Check | |--------|-------| | Core argument | Intact | | Causal claims | Preserved | | Hedging | Appropriate | | Conclusions | Unchanged |
4. AI Pattern Reduction
v3.0 uses the 6-component composite formula:
| Aspect | Check | |--------|-------| | AI probability (v3.0 composite) | Decreased from baseline | | pattern_score | Decreased | | discourse_penalty | Decreased (NEW) | | psycholinguistic_penalty | Decreased (NEW) | | Minimum reduction | >=20% expected per full pipeline | | Targeted patterns | Resolved per mode specification | | New patterns | Flag if G6 introduced new patterns |
**v3.0 Regression Checks:**
IF discourse_penalty_after > discourse_penalty_before:
FLAG "Discourse penalty increased after humanization"
severity: Major
IF psycholinguistic_penalty_after > psycholinguistic_penalty_before:
FLAG "Psycholinguistic penalty increased after humanization"
severity: Major
IF connective_diversity_after < connective_diversity_before:
FLAG "Connective diversity decreased"
severity: Warning
IF hapax_rate_after < hapax_rate_before:
FLAG "Hapax rate decreased (vocabulary became more repetitive)"
severity: Warning5. Burstiness Verification (MAJOR)
| Aspect | Check | |--------|-------| | Burstiness CV | Target > 0.45 | | Current CV | Report measured value | | CV direction | Must not decrease after humanization | | Sentence length range | Report min/max word counts | | Short declaratives | Verify presence of sentences <= 12 words | | Long constructions | Verify presence of sentences >= 35 words |
**Verification logic:**
IF post_cv < pre_cv:
FLAG "Burstiness decreased after humanization"
severity: Major
IF post_cv < 0.35:
WARN "Burstiness still in AI-typical range (<0.35)"
recommendation: "Consider additional sentence length variation in next pass"
IF post_cv >= 0.45:
PASS "Burstiness meets human-like target"6. Structural Pattern Check (MAJOR)
| Aspect | Check | |--------|-------| | S7 (Enumeration as Prose) | Reduced or eliminated | | S8 (Repetitive Paragraph Openers) | Reduced or eliminated | | S9 (Formulaic Section Structure) | Reduced or eliminated | | S10 (Hypothesis Checklist Pattern) | Reduced or eliminated | | New structural patterns | Flag if introduced by G6 | | Pre/post comparison | Report structural pattern counts |
**Verification logic:**
pre_structural_count = count(S7, S8, S9, S10 in original)
post_structural_count = count(S7, S8, S9, S10 in humanized)
IF post_structural_count > pre_structural_count:
FLAG "New structural patterns introduced"
severity: Major
IF post_structural_count == pre_structural_count AND pass >= 2:
WARN "Structural patterns unchanged after structural pass"
recommendation: "Review G6 structural transformation effectiveness"
IF post_structural_count < pre_structural_count:
PASS "Structural patterns reduced by {delta}"7. Cross-Section Coherence
| Aspect | Check | |--------|-------| | Terminology consistency | Same terms used across sections for same concepts | | Structural contradictions | Changes in one section do not contradict another | | Section transitions | Transitions between sections still make sense | | Reference consistency | Internal references (e.g., "as discussed above") still valid | | Abbreviation consistency | Abbreviations defined before use, consistent throughout |
8. Discourse Naturalness (NEW in v3.0 -- MAJOR)
| Aspect | Check | Target | |--------|-------|--------| | Connective diversity | unique connectives / total connectives | > 0.70 | | Question presence (Discussion) | At least 1 rhetorical question | >= 1 | | First-person voice (Discussion) | I/we/my/our usage | >= 2 instances | | Rhetorical sequence non-monotonicity | Does NOT follow default 5-step template | Non-monotonic | | Digression presence (Discussion) | Parenthetical/retrospective asides | >= 1 | | Abstract noun ratio | abstract nouns / total nouns | < 0.30 | | Hapax rate | unique words appearing once / total | > 0.45 | | Paragraph length variance | CV of paragraph word counts | > 0.40 |
**Verification logic:**
IF connective_diversity < 0.50:
FLAG "Connective diversity critically low"
severity: Major
recommendation: "Apply DT4 connective reduction"
IF connective_diversity < 0.70:
WARN "Connective diver📌 文档结构(2026-07-22 起): 本文件是中文默认入口 —— banner + badges + 信任面 + 9 阶段流水线速览 + 76 行合集总表。 每个合集的完整描述、按用途分组、精确数字、验证方法在 docs/CONTENT_ZH.md(扩展正文,总表行内的 → 直接跳转到对应锚点)。 English version: README-en.md · 中文扩展正文:docs/CONTENT_ZH.md · README-zh-CN.md 已弃用(重定向占位) 🌐 语言: English |
Other agents on auto-empirical-research-skills.
- data-detective
Investigates data quality, profiling datasets for distributional anomalies, missingness patterns, panel structure, merge diagnostics, and variable construction issues. Use when working with a new dataset, validating merges, checking panel structure, profiling variables for
Open agent - literature-scout
Conducts systematic literature surveys of econometric methods, seminal papers, and prior applications. Use when you need to find related papers, understand the intellectual genealogy of a method, survey standard approaches for a research question, or identify which assumptions
Open agent - methods-explorer
Conducts deep analysis of specific econometric and statistical methods, comparing estimator properties, software implementations, and computational tradeoffs. Also researches benchmark parameter values, calibration targets, and stylized facts from the literature. Use when
Open agent - econometric-reviewer
Reviews estimation code with an extremely high quality bar for identification, inference, and econometric correctness. Use after implementing estimation routines, modifying econometric models, running regressions, or writing code that uses statsmodels, linearmodels, PyBLP,
Open agent - identification-critic
--- name: identification-critic effort: high maxTurns: 15 skills: [causal-inference, identification-proofs, game-theory, structural-modeling] disallowedTools: [Edit, Write, MultiEdit, NotebookEdit] description: >- Scrutinizes identification arguments for completeness,
Open agent - journal-referee
Simulates a top-5 economics journal referee providing a full report on research quality, contribution, and methodology. Use when reviewing draft papers, written artifacts, research projects before submission, or during /workflows:review on completed work. <examples> <example>
Open agent

