aesthetic-instrument
great_cto's own committed aesthetic — the instrument panel. Dark five-step surface ladder, exactly one accent, two faces divided by MEANING (Geist speaks,…
What to do the moment a secret is exposed — pasted into chat, committed, logged, shown in a transcript or a screenshot. The secret is compromised; only revoking and rotating it helps. Turns it into one tracked task with an escalation, not a reminder repeated every session. Use
$ npx -y skills add avelikiy/great_cto --skill secrets-rotation --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/secrets-rotationContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
What to do the moment a secret is exposed — pasted into chat, committed, logged, shown in a transcript or a screenshot. The secret is compromised; only revoking and rotating it helps. Turns it into one tracked task with an escalation, not a reminder repeated every session. Use
name: secrets-rotation
description: What to do the moment a secret is exposed — pasted into chat, committed, logged, shown in a transcript or a screenshot. The secret is compromised; only revoking and rotating it helps. Turns it into one tracked task with an escalation, not a reminder repeated every session. Use when you see a key, token, password or private key anywhere it should not be ("ключ в чате", "токен в логах", "закоммитил .env"). Loaded by security-officer, l3-support, devops.
when_to_use: |
Apply when:
- a key, token, password or private key appears in a message, a commit, a log, a transcript, a screenshot or a context file
- the operator pastes a credential into the conversation
- a secret scanner (scripts/hooks/secret-scan.mjs, gitleaks) reports a finding
- a session log carries "rotate the X key" forward from an earlier session
Do NOT apply to:
- test fixtures that are assembled at runtime and match no live account
effort: low
allowed-tools: Read, Bash, GrepDeleting the message, rewriting git history or redacting the log does not un-expose a secret: the transcript, the remote, the backup and the provider's own logs already hold it. The only fix is to make the exposed value worthless — **revoke it and issue a new one**.
What went wrong on real projects is not ignorance of that. It is that the rotation was **remembered instead of tracked**: "rotate the exchange API keys" was carried forward through seven session logs; "keys that passed through chat" appeared in seven summaries of another project; a monitoring token pasted in plain text was never rotated. Each session wrote the reminder again and nobody owned it.
1. **Never repeat the value.** Not in your answer, not in a task title, not in a log, not in a commit message. Name its **kind** and **where it is**: "OpenRouter API key, in the operator's message of 22.09, 14:10". `scripts/lib/secret-patterns.mjs` names the kind. 2. **Say it plainly, first line:** this key is compromised; revoking it is the only fix. 3. **Open one task, not a note** — in Beads if the project has it:
bd create "Rotate <kind> exposed in <where> on <date>" -t bug -p 0 \
-d "Exposed: <where>. Revoke at <provider console>, issue new, store in <secret store>, redeploy <consumers>, prove the old one is rejected."Priority 0 for a production credential or anything that moves money; 1 otherwise. 4. **If you can rotate it, rotate it** — the operator asked you to handle it, or your task covers that system. If it needs the operator (a provider console you cannot reach, a hardware token), the task's first line says exactly what they must click.
A rotation is closed with evidence, not with "rotated":
`preferences.md`, memory files, a README or any file that is loaded into a model's context (one key in a preferences file reached 605 transcripts);
An open rotation task older than 48 hours goes to the top of the next session's report and of `/inbox`, with its age. Do not re-list it in the session log as a fresh item — link the task. Re-writing a reminder is how the seven-session carry-over happened.
You already have the agent. This is everything around it. great_cto runs Claude Code as a pipeline of 70 specialist agents — an independent model checks each stage before the next builds on it, spending caps refuse rather than warn, and three decisions stay yours: what gets built, how, and whether it ships.
Repo: avelikiy/great_cto
great_cto's own committed aesthetic — the instrument panel. Dark five-step surface ladder, exactly one accent, two faces divided by MEANING (Geist speaks,…
Catalogue of known SDLC anti-patterns that great_cto agents must actively reject when reviewing architecture, plans, code, or post-mortems. Used by architect…
Analyze images, websites, and Figma files to extract their design and generate a `design.md` with token system, component inventory, and reconstruction notes.…
Shared review framework that every domain reviewer (pci, oracle, gov, edtech, healthcare, mlops, etc.) MUST follow. Defines the output artifact (TM-{slug}.md),…
Structured idea generation + multi-LLM debate for the product-owner stage. Diverge (generate genuinely different bets), debate (a 4-persona panel on 4 models…
Run the great_cto controlled Codex lifecycle with controller-owned writes, verifier evidence, human gates and optional artifact release.