aesthetic-instrument
great_cto's own committed aesthetic — the instrument panel. Dark five-step surface ladder, exactly one accent, two faces divided by MEANING (Geist speaks,…
Email/SMS lifecycle and deliverability framework for SMB Product-Builder products that send transactional or lifecycle messages (booking reminders, CRM sequences, receipts, win-back). Codifies provider selection (Resend/Postmark/Twilio/SendGrid), domain auth (SPF/DKIM/DMARC),
$ npx -y skills add avelikiy/great_cto --skill lifecycle-messaging --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/lifecycle-messagingContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Email/SMS lifecycle and deliverability framework for SMB Product-Builder products that send transactional or lifecycle messages (booking reminders, CRM sequences, receipts, win-back). Codifies provider selection (Resend/Postmark/Twilio/SendGrid), domain auth (SPF/DKIM/DMARC),
name: lifecycle-messaging description: Email/SMS lifecycle and deliverability framework for SMB Product-Builder products that send transactional or lifecycle messages (booking reminders, CRM sequences, receipts, win-back). Codifies provider selection (Resend/Postmark/Twilio/SendGrid), domain auth (SPF/DKIM/DMARC), consent and compliance (TCPA, CAN-SPAM, CASL, quiet hours, double opt-in), suppression-list discipline, and the transactional-vs-marketing split. Applied by integrations-engineer and senior-dev whenever a feature sends messages — so deliverability and consent are designed in, not bolted on after the first spam complaint. when_to_use: | Apply when a feature sends email or SMS: - integrations-engineer designing a Twilio / email-provider integration - senior-dev implementing booking reminders, CRM sequences, receipts, or win-back - architect deciding the messaging provider + domain-auth setup for a crm/booking product Do NOT apply for purely in-app notifications with no email/SMS leg. effort: medium allowed-tools: Read, Write, Grep, Glob, WebFetch paths: - "docs/integrations/**" - "docs/architecture/**"
Messages that don't arrive (poor deliverability) or that arrive without consent (TCPA/ CAN-SPAM violations) are both fatal for an SMB product. This skill makes both correct by construction. **Design the consent + deliverability posture before the first send.**
Decide per message which bucket it is; they have different rules and should use different sending identities (often different subdomains / providers):
| | Transactional | Marketing / lifecycle | |---|---|---| | Examples | receipt, booking confirm/reminder, password reset | win-back, promo, newsletter, nurture step | | Consent | implied by the transaction | **explicit opt-in required** | | Unsubscribe | not required (but honor STOP) | **required**, one-click, honored fast | | Sending domain | `txn.` subdomain | `mail.`/`news.` subdomain |
Never send marketing content on the transactional channel "because it delivers better" — that's how the transactional domain gets burned.
(DX-first, good default), SendGrid (scale). Default: **Resend for transactional**, add a marketing-grade ESP only when lifecycle volume justifies it.
not a single number, for scale + failover. A2P 10DLC registration is **required** for US application-to-person SMS — register the brand/campaign before sending.
aligned. Without DMARC alignment, lifecycle mail lands in spam.
one-click unsubscribe honored within 10 days.
HELP keywords automatically; respect **quiet hours** (no marketing 9pm–8am recipient local time). Keep proof of consent (timestamp, source).
consent.
Maintain a single **suppression list** the sender checks before every send:
A send that ignores suppression is the fastest path to a blocklist.
retry) — coordinate the key with integrations-engineer.
failures, don't swallow them.
When applied, contribute a **Messaging** section to the integration contract (`docs/integrations/INTEGRATE-{slug}.md`):
## Messaging - channels: email <provider> / sms <provider> - identities: txn = <subdomain>, marketing = <subdomain/ESP> - domain auth: SPF/DKIM/DMARC plan = <state> - consent: <implied/explicit per message type>; STOP/HELP = handled - quiet hours: <recipient-local window>; 10DLC: <registered?> - suppression: <store> checked pre-send - idempotency key: <derivation>
You already have the agent. This is everything around it. great_cto runs Claude Code as a pipeline of 70 specialist agents — an independent model checks each stage before the next builds on it, spending caps refuse rather than warn, and three decisions stay yours: what gets built, how, and whether it ships.
Repo: avelikiy/great_cto
great_cto's own committed aesthetic — the instrument panel. Dark five-step surface ladder, exactly one accent, two faces divided by MEANING (Geist speaks,…
Catalogue of known SDLC anti-patterns that great_cto agents must actively reject when reviewing architecture, plans, code, or post-mortems. Used by architect…
Analyze images, websites, and Figma files to extract their design and generate a `design.md` with token system, component inventory, and reconstruction notes.…
Shared review framework that every domain reviewer (pci, oracle, gov, edtech, healthcare, mlops, etc.) MUST follow. Defines the output artifact (TM-{slug}.md),…
Structured idea generation + multi-LLM debate for the product-owner stage. Diverge (generate genuinely different bets), debate (a 4-persona panel on 4 models…
Run the great_cto controlled Codex lifecycle with controller-owned writes, verifier evidence, human gates and optional artifact release.