/discovery
Structured pre-design questioning to surface hidden constraints before any architecture decision is locked in. Forces the architect/auditor/reviewer to enumerate what they DON'T know before proposing.
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add avelikiy/great_cto --skill discovery --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add avelikiy/great_cto --skill discovery -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add avelikiy/great_cto --skill discovery -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add avelikiy/great_cto --skill discovery -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add avelikiy/great_cto --skill discovery -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add avelikiy/great_cto --skill discovery -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add avelikiy/great_cto --skill discovery -a windsurf -y
SKILL.md
discovery.SKILL.mdname: discovery
description: Structured pre-design questioning to surface hidden constraints before any architecture decision is locked in. Forces the architect/auditor/reviewer to enumerate what they DON'T know before proposing.
when_to_use: |
Apply BEFORE producing architecture docs, audit findings, security plans:
- architect, before writing ARCH-*.md
- project-auditor, at the start of /audit
- security-officer, before threat-modeling
- l3-support, when triaging a new incident
- regulated-reviewer, when classifying compliance scope
- any reviewer who needs domain context the user hasn't given
effort: medium
allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash(git:*), Bash(bd:*)
paths:
- "docs/**"
- ".great_cto/**"
- "README*"
Discovery — surface hidden constraints first
The biggest cause of bad agent output is missing context. Before locking in a decision, enumerate what you don't know and surface it.
The 7 discovery dimensions
For any non-trivial request, walk through these and record findings in the report's "Context" section:
1. Who depends on this?
- What other services / teams consume the thing you're changing?
- Are there public consumers (open API, OSS users)?
- Is there a deprecation path if you break compatibility?
Grep for: `grep -rE "import.*<your-module>|require.*<your-module>"` in the repo and any sibling repos you have access to.
2. What's the scale today, what's it in 6 months?
- Current traffic: requests/sec, queries/sec, MB/day, daily-active-users
- Storage: rows in main tables, size on disk
- Cost: monthly LLM spend, infra spend
- 6-month projection: linear? exponential? unknown?
If unknown, write: "scale unknown — request from user before proceeding."
3. What MUST not change?
- Existing API contracts (backward compatibility window)
- Database schema columns referenced by reporting / BI
- File formats consumed by other tools
- Regulatory commitments (audit log retention, SLA RPO/RTO)
4. What's the budget?
- Monthly cost ceiling (LLM + infra)
- Headcount: 1-person task vs cross-team effort
- Calendar: "must ship by X" vs "best by Y"
If unstated, default to "small project_size, 1-engineer-week, <$200/mo budget." Surface this default in the report so the user can correct.
5. What's the failure mode that matters?
Ask: "If this feature breaks at 3am, what gets paged?"
- Data loss → CRITICAL
- Wrong answer to user → HIGH
- Slow response → MEDIUM
- Bad UX (cosmetic) → LOW
The failure mode dictates investment level (e.g., do you need a canary? A circuit breaker? Just a feature flag?).
6. What's already been tried?
- Search Beads: `bd search "<keyword>"` — has this been attempted before?
- Search docs/decisions: any superseded ADR on this topic?
- Search lessons.md: any past learning about this pattern?
If past work exists, build on it. Don't redo it.
7. Who decides?
- Is there a CTO sign-off needed (gate:plan, gate:ship)?
- Is there a compliance reviewer required (PCI for fintech, HIPAA for healthcare)?
- Does this need an RFC (multi-team decision)?
Output
A discovery section at the top of your report:
## Context
- **Consumers:** <list, or "unknown — TBD with user">
- **Scale:** <today, 6mo projection>
- **Frozen contracts:** <list, or "none identified">
- **Budget:** <cost + time + people>
- **Failure-mode tier:** Critical | High | Medium | Low
- **Prior work:** <links to ADRs/lessons, or "none found">
- **Decision-makers:** <gate or RFC required>
When to skip
- **nano project_size** — discovery is overhead. Skip and document that
you skipped: "nano — discovery skipped per skill rules."
- **Pure utility extraction** with no behaviour change — skip.
- **Verbal bug-fix from user** with clear repro — skip.
Common gotchas
- **Don't assume.** If you write "I assume the user wants X", that
assumption belongs in Context as a question, not as a fact.
- **Don't outsource to user.** Discovery is YOUR job. Bring back as many
answers as Glob/Grep/git can produce. Only ask the user for what code cannot tell you.
Read more
name: discovery description: Structured pre-design questioning to surface hidden constraints before any architecture decision is locked in. Forces the architect/auditor/reviewer to enumerate what they DON'T know before proposing. when_to_use: | Apply BEFORE producing architecture docs, audit findings, security plans: - architect, before writing ARCH-*.md - project-auditor, at the start of /audit - security-officer, before threat-modeling - l3-support, when triaging a new incident - regulated-reviewer, when classifying compliance scope - any reviewer who needs domain context the user hasn't given effort: medium allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash(git:*), Bash(bd:*) paths: - "docs/**" - ".great_cto/**" - "README*"
Discovery — surface hidden constraints first
The biggest cause of bad agent output is missing context. Before locking in a decision, enumerate what you don't know and surface it.
The 7 discovery dimensions
For any non-trivial request, walk through these and record findings in the report's "Context" section:
1. Who depends on this?
- What other services / teams consume the thing you're changing?
- Are there public consumers (open API, OSS users)?
- Is there a deprecation path if you break compatibility?
Grep for: `grep -rE "import.*<your-module>|require.*<your-module>"` in the repo and any sibling repos you have access to.
2. What's the scale today, what's it in 6 months?
- Current traffic: requests/sec, queries/sec, MB/day, daily-active-users
- Storage: rows in main tables, size on disk
- Cost: monthly LLM spend, infra spend
- 6-month projection: linear? exponential? unknown?
If unknown, write: "scale unknown — request from user before proceeding."
3. What MUST not change?
- Existing API contracts (backward compatibility window)
- Database schema columns referenced by reporting / BI
- File formats consumed by other tools
- Regulatory commitments (audit log retention, SLA RPO/RTO)
4. What's the budget?
- Monthly cost ceiling (LLM + infra)
- Headcount: 1-person task vs cross-team effort
- Calendar: "must ship by X" vs "best by Y"
If unstated, default to "small project_size, 1-engineer-week, <$200/mo budget." Surface this default in the report so the user can correct.
5. What's the failure mode that matters?
Ask: "If this feature breaks at 3am, what gets paged?"
- Data loss → CRITICAL
- Wrong answer to user → HIGH
- Slow response → MEDIUM
- Bad UX (cosmetic) → LOW
The failure mode dictates investment level (e.g., do you need a canary? A circuit breaker? Just a feature flag?).
6. What's already been tried?
- Search Beads: `bd search "<keyword>"` — has this been attempted before?
- Search docs/decisions: any superseded ADR on this topic?
- Search lessons.md: any past learning about this pattern?
If past work exists, build on it. Don't redo it.
7. Who decides?
- Is there a CTO sign-off needed (gate:plan, gate:ship)?
- Is there a compliance reviewer required (PCI for fintech, HIPAA for healthcare)?
- Does this need an RFC (multi-team decision)?
Output
A discovery section at the top of your report:
## Context - **Consumers:** <list, or "unknown — TBD with user"> - **Scale:** <today, 6mo projection> - **Frozen contracts:** <list, or "none identified"> - **Budget:** <cost + time + people> - **Failure-mode tier:** Critical | High | Medium | Low - **Prior work:** <links to ADRs/lessons, or "none found"> - **Decision-makers:** <gate or RFC required>
When to skip
- **nano project_size** — discovery is overhead. Skip and document that
you skipped: "nano — discovery skipped per skill rules."
- **Pure utility extraction** with no behaviour change — skip.
- **Verbal bug-fix from user** with clear repro — skip.
Common gotchas
- **Don't assume.** If you write "I assume the user wants X", that
assumption belongs in Context as a question, not as a fact.
- **Don't outsource to user.** Discovery is YOUR job. Bring back as many
answers as Glob/Grep/git can produce. Only ask the user for what code cannot tell you.
You already have the agent. This is everything around it. great_cto runs Claude Code as a pipeline of 70 specialist agents — an independent model checks each stage before the next builds on it, spending caps refuse rather than warn, and three decisions stay yours: what gets built, how, and whether it ships.
Other skills on great-cto.
More skills from other plugins.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
ask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Questions about discovery.
- Which coding agents can use discovery?
- discovery installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.

