design-chain
Run one design round through the design chain: vision, owners, brief with verbatim anchors, three directions, craft manifest,…
Run all required_checks for the active issue and record the verified receipt
> /plugin marketplace add assafkip/kipi-systemHow it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/issue-verifyContext preview
What this command does when you run it.
Run all required_checks for the active issue and record the verified receipt
description: Run all required_checks for the active issue and record the verified receipt
**Autonomy contract.** This step is agent-handled, not founder-gated. Verify automatically once `required_checks` have all exited 0. Record the verified receipt without founder confirmation. The receipt itself is the audit signal: the founder reads it after the fact, not before. Founder-gated steps are still: `/issue-approve`, `/prd-approve`, `/prd-split` commit, and any scope amendment mid-issue. This step is not one of them.
Verify the active DSSE issue. Execute in order:
1. Run `python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/issue_runner.py" status`. Confirm an issue is loaded. If `issue_id` is null, stop and tell the founder to run `/issue-start <issue-id>` first.
2. Run `python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/issue_runner.py" verify`.
This ONE command is the whole step. It runs every check in the spec snapshot itself, records each check's exit code and an output hash as evidence, and writes the verified receipt only if all of them exit 0.
Do NOT run the checks by hand first. `verify` runs them from the snapshot taken at `/issue-start`, which is the thing the receipt attests to; a check you ran yourself from the live spec can differ from that snapshot, and the receipt would then describe a run nobody made. There is no way to record this receipt without running the checks -- `mark verified` refuses by design (ASK-402).
An issue loaded after ASK-1810 (its state carries `"verify_contract": 2`) gets more from the same command, all computed by `verify` and sealed into the receipt, never typed:
`kipi check`) is refused before anything runs; CI runs it once per PR;
its tracked path, seen by `real_path_observer/sitecustomize.py`; a check that only runs a copy is refused;
AST, against the runner's own count; hidden tests are refused;
refused below 5 runs or on any red run.
against verify's own clean run. `caught` names the tests that failed only under the mutant; a test failing in both runs is not counted. A `silent` mutant (the runner's output shows no new failure) is refused by name. No caught mutant is recorded as `gap`, not refused. A typed tally is never read: verify reads only `<state_dir>/mutants/<issue_id>/*.json`, and only the `mutant` verb writes there.
To record a mutant (founder budget: one per new decision point): apply a one-line break to the tracked file, run `python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/issue_runner.py" mutant <name>` (lowercase letters, digits, dashes), put the code back, then run `verify`. The `mutant` verb runs the snapshot's checks and stores their raw output; it never judges. Only `verify` turns that output into a count.
3. If `verify` exits 0:
(`checks_run` is the count).
`repeats` from the same JSON. These are the closeout numbers; do not restate them from memory. A mutant count that is not in `mutants` is a claim, not a closeout number.
4. If `verify` exits 2:
issue, it is a spec with nothing to attest to: tell the founder to add a check or amend the spec.
Do not run `/codex:review` here. That is `/issue-review`. Do not edit the spec here. That happens only in `/issue-start` and `/issue-closeout`.
Give your AI the right knowledge, at the moment it needs it. Kipi turns the scattered knowledge around your work into context that follows you across AI sessions: decisions, conversations, projects, people, commitments, lessons, documents, history.
Run one design round through the design chain: vision, owners, brief with verbatim anchors, three directions, craft manifest,…
Create the queued Linear projects and issues that shell scripts captured offline.
Scaffold a new RCA document from the canonical template, ready to fill.
Synthesize the previous assistant response to audio; autoplays locally with controls.
Run the full voice review on one draft by hand (bands, shapes, echo, gate roster, channel rules).