lamina-design
Shape intended product behavior in Lamina's transactional graph when explicitly invoked as lamina-design or when passive…
Define authoritative runtime product truth across actors and views. Use when modeling domain behavior, setting product density, specifying side effects, protecting invariants, choosing consistency guarantees, handling retries or concurrent actions, defining time semantics and
$ npx -y skills add aryaniyaps/lamina --skill lamina-product-behavior --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/lamina-product-behaviorContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Define authoritative runtime product truth across actors and views. Use when modeling domain behavior, setting product density, specifying side effects, protecting invariants, choosing consistency guarantees, handling retries or concurrent actions, defining time semantics and
name: lamina-product-behavior description: "Define authoritative runtime product truth across actors and views. Use when modeling domain behavior, setting product density, specifying side effects, protecting invariants, choosing consistency guarantees, handling retries or concurrent actions, defining time semantics and prerequisites, drawing ownership boundaries, or keeping views coherent. Use lamina-systems for causal loops and change over time, and lamina-ux for interaction expression."
1. Match the request's primary runtime-truth decision to one row below. 2. Open that linked reference before answering. Add another only when a second decision materially changes the answer; do not preload the directory. 3. Start the response with `Using lamina-product-behavior: <topic path(s)>` so the selected behavior lens is auditable.
| Runtime signal | Read | Adds | |---|---|---| | Need the represented domain model to match how actors understand the task | [Product Behavior](references/product-behavior.md) | entities, permissions, workflows, surfaces, and illegal states | | Need to choose how much power or complexity each actor sees | [Product Density](references/platform-posture.md) | actor- and surface-specific complexity budgets | | One mutation must update, notify, invalidate, audit, or retry elsewhere | [Side Effects](references/side-effects.md) | primary effect, downstream effects, delivery lifecycle, and failure recovery | | Need a rule that must hold in every valid state | [Invariants](references/invariants.md) | explicit predicates and violation probes | | Views may lag or disagree after a state change | [Consistency Guarantees](references/consistency-guarantees.md) | strong, eventual, and read-your-writes product promises | | An operation may repeat, race, conflict, or arrive after state changed | [Idempotency and Concurrency](references/idempotency-concurrency.md) | duplicate safety, conflict policy, and fencing | | Behavior depends on zones, dates, recurrence, duration, deadline, or correction | [Time Semantics](references/time-semantics.md) | explicit temporal meaning and boundary behavior | | A workflow requires prior setup, ownership, state, or another workflow | [Dependencies](references/dependencies.md) | prerequisite edges and unmet behavior | | Need to decide which domain owns a rule or what data crosses a boundary | [Modularity Boundaries](references/modularity-boundaries.md) | information hiding and cohesive ownership | | Several roles or surfaces must agree on the same entity and lifecycle | [Multi-View Integrity](references/multi-view-integrity.md) | handoffs, visibility, and cross-view truth |
Use the smallest sufficient reference set. Common pairs are invariants + idempotency for consequential writes, consistency + multi-view integrity for role-based products, and side effects + time semantics for scheduled delivery. Keep behavior in product language; do not prescribe implementation machinery unless the user asks for it.
Headless product design for AI coding agents, backed by a transactional product graph | Design how it works, verify what you ship.
Shape intended product behavior in Lamina's transactional graph when explicitly invoked as lamina-design or when passive…
Judge product usability and evidence quality. Use when running Persona-based walkthroughs on a built product, planning an expert…
Use only when explicitly invoked as lamina-init. Establish business evidence and canonical Product, Actor, and Persona resources…
Frame product problems and decide what to build. Use when establishing business context, aligning actors with conflicting goals,…
Plan and synthesize evidence-grounded product research. Use when deciding what evidence is needed, designing actor walkthroughs,…
Reason about causal product systems and change over time. Use when mapping stocks, flows, delays, purposes, or interconnections;…