/vuln-patterns

name: Vulnerability Patterns
description: This skill should be used when the user asks about "vulnerability patterns", "how to find SQL injection", "XSS patterns", "command injection techniques", "OWASP vulnerabilities", "common web vulnerabilities", "exploitation patterns", or needs to understand how specific vulnerability classes work during whitebox security review.
version: 1.0.0

Vulnerability Patterns Reference

Purpose

Provide comprehensive knowledge of common web vulnerability patterns for whitebox penetration testing. Understanding these patterns enables identification of security flaws during code review and guides exploitation techniques.

When to Use

Activate this skill when:

• Analyzing potential vulnerabilities found during sink search
• Understanding how specific vulnerability classes work
• Determining exploitability of identified code patterns
• Learning attack techniques for specific vulnerability types

OWASP Top 10 Overview

| Rank | Category | Code Indicators | Related Skill | |------|----------|-----------------|---------------| | A01 | Broken Access Control | Missing auth checks, IDOR patterns | `business-logic` | | A02 | Cryptographic Failures | Weak algorithms, hardcoded keys | `cryptographic-failures` | | A03 | Injection | User input in queries/commands | `vuln-patterns` (this skill) | | A04 | Insecure Design | Logic flaws, missing controls | `business-logic` | | A05 | Security Misconfiguration | Debug enabled, default creds | `security-misconfiguration` | | A06 | Vulnerable and Outdated Components | Dependency vulns, build pipeline | *(out of scope)* | | A07 | Identification and Authentication Failures | Weak session, credential issues | `vuln-patterns` (this skill) | | A08 | Software and Data Integrity Failures | Deserialization, CI/CD issues | `vuln-patterns` (this skill) | | A09 | Security Logging and Monitoring Failures | Missing logs, log injection | `logging-failures` | | A10 | Server-Side Request Forgery | Attacker-controlled outbound fetches | `vulnerability-chains`, `framework-patterns` |

See `owasp-2025` skill for complete mapping with CWE references.

Core Vulnerability Categories

SQL Injection (SQLi)

**Pattern**: User input concatenated into SQL queries

**Indicators**:

• String concatenation in query construction
• Template literals/f-strings in SQL
• Missing parameterized queries
• Raw/native query methods

**Exploitation Flow**: 1. Identify injection point 2. Determine database type 3. Test with basic payloads 4. Extract data or escalate

**Risk Impact**: Data breach, authentication bypass, RCE (in some cases)

Command Injection

**Pattern**: User input passed to system command functions

**Indicators**:

• Command execution functions with user data
• Shell metacharacters not filtered
• Insufficient input validation

**Exploitation Flow**: 1. Identify command execution sink 2. Trace user input to sink 3. Test command separators 4. Chain commands for exploitation

**Risk Impact**: Remote Code Execution, full system compromise

Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)

**Types**:

• Reflected: Input reflected in response
• Stored: Input persisted and displayed
• DOM-based: Client-side JavaScript manipulation

**Indicators**:

• User input in HTML output without encoding
• Dynamic HTML insertion with user data
• Missing output encoding

**Risk Impact**: Session hijacking, credential theft, malware distribution

Path Traversal / LFI

**Pattern**: User input in file path operations

**Indicators**:

• File inclusion with user-controlled path
• File read/write with user input
• Missing path validation

**Exploitation Flow**: 1. Identify file operation with user input 2. Test traversal sequences 3. Target sensitive files 4. Chain with other vulnerabilities

**Risk Impact**: Information disclosure, source code leak, potential RCE

Deserialization

**Pattern**: Untrusted data passed to deserialization functions

**Indicators**:

• Deserialization functions with user data
• User-controlled serialized data
• Missing type validation

**Exploitation Flow**: 1. Identify deserialization sink 2. Find gadget chains 3. Craft malicious payload 4. Achieve code execution

**Risk Impact**: Remote Code Execution

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

**Pattern**: User-controlled URLs in server-side requests

**Indicators**:

• HTTP client with user-provided URL
• URL validation bypass possibilities
• Internal network access

**Exploitation Flow**: 1. Identify HTTP request with user URL 2. Test internal endpoints 3. Bypass URL validation 4. Access internal services

**Risk Impact**: Internal network access, cloud metadata exposure

SSRF Exfiltration Vectors

When SSRF response is not directly returned to the attacker, consider these exfiltration methods:

| Vector | How It Works | Detection | |--------|--------------|-----------| | **External Callback** | SSRF visits attacker-controlled URL with data | Check if outbound requests are allowed | | **DNS Exfiltration** | Data encoded in subdomain (e.g., `secret.evil.com`) | Works even with firewall restrictions | | **Cache Poisoning** | Response cached, retrieved later by attacker | Check proxy cache config for static extensions | | **Error-Based** | Error messages leak response data | Check error handling and logging | | **Timing/Blind** | Response time reveals information | Measure response latency variations | | **File Write** | Write response to accessible location | Check for file write primitives |

**Cache-Based Exfiltration Pattern** (commonly missed):

1. SSRF makes request to /sensitive-endpoint.png
2. Proxy caches response (thinks it's static file)
3. Attacker requests /sensitive-endpoint.png
4. Gets cached sensitive data

See `cache-poisoning` skill for detailed detection patterns.

Template Injection (SSTI)

**Pattern**: User input rendered in server-side templates

**Indicators**:

• Template rendering with user-controlled template
• Template syntax in user input

**