/ai-patterns-tool-use-patterns
Provider-agnostic patterns for LLM function calling, tool loops, and agentic workflows
$ npx -y skills add agents-inc/skills --skill ai-patterns-tool-use-patterns --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/ai-patterns-tool-use-patterns
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Provider-agnostic patterns for LLM function calling, tool loops, and agentic workflows
SKILL.md
ai-patterns-tool-use-patterns.SKILL.mdname: ai-patterns-tool-use-patterns
description: Provider-agnostic patterns for LLM function calling, tool loops, and agentic workflows
Tool Use Patterns
> **Quick Guide:** Tool use (function calling) lets LLMs invoke external functions. The universal pattern is: define tool schemas (JSON Schema for parameters) -> send tools + message to LLM -> detect tool_use in response -> execute locally -> return result to LLM -> repeat until the model responds with text. Guard every loop with a max-step limit, validate all tool inputs before execution, and return structured errors so the model can recover. Use tool choice control (`auto`, `required`, `none`, specific tool) to steer model behavior.
---
<critical_requirements>
CRITICAL: Before Using This Skill
> **All code must follow project conventions in CLAUDE.md** (kebab-case, named exports, import ordering, `import type`, named constants)
**(You MUST guard every tool loop with a maximum step limit -- unbounded loops risk infinite API calls and runaway costs)**
**(You MUST validate all tool input arguments before execution -- LLM-generated arguments are untrusted input)**
**(You MUST return structured error messages to the model when tool execution fails -- never silently swallow errors or return empty results)**
**(You MUST use JSON Schema for tool parameter definitions -- all major providers require this format)**
**(You MUST treat tool definitions as token cost -- every tool schema is sent on every API call, so keep descriptions concise but precise)**
</critical_requirements>
---
**Auto-detection:** tool use, function calling, tool_calls, tool_use, tool call loop, agent loop, tool definition, tool schema, toolChoice, tool_choice, parallel tool calls, human-in-the-loop, tool approval, agentic workflow, multi-step agent, tool result, tool error
**When to use:**
- Implementing LLM tool calling / function calling in any provider
- Building agent loops that call tools iteratively until a task is complete
- Handling parallel tool calls (multiple tools in one response)
- Reporting tool errors back to the model for recovery
- Controlling tool selection (auto, required, none, force specific)
- Adding human approval gates before dangerous tool execution
- Streaming responses that include tool calls
**Key patterns covered:**
- Tool definition schemas (JSON Schema for parameters, descriptions)
- The core tool call loop (send -> detect -> execute -> return -> re-send)
- Parallel tool calls (handling multiple calls in one response)
- Error handling (reporting tool failures back to the model)
- Tool choice control (auto, required, none, specific tool)
- Multi-step agent workflows with conversation state
- Human-in-the-loop approval patterns
- Type-safe tool definitions in TypeScript
- Security (input validation, sandboxing, least privilege)
- Streaming with tool calls
**When NOT to use:**
- Simple text generation without tool calling -- no tools needed
- Structured output / JSON extraction -- use your provider's structured output feature instead
- Provider-specific SDK patterns -- use your provider's SDK skill for SDK-specific APIs
**Detailed Resources:**
- [examples/core.md](examples/core.md) -- Tool definitions, the tool call loop, error handling, type-safe tools
- [examples/advanced.md](examples/advanced.md) -- Parallel tool calls, multi-step agents, human-in-the-loop, streaming, security
- [reference.md](reference.md) -- Decision frameworks, provider comparison, anti-pattern checklist
---
<philosophy>
Philosophy
Tool use is the mechanism that turns LLMs from text generators into agents. The model cannot execute code, query databases, or call APIs -- it can only _request_ that your code does so by emitting structured tool calls. Your code is the executor; the model is the planner.
**Core principles:**
1. **The model plans, you execute** -- The LLM emits tool call requests with structured arguments. Your code validates, executes, and returns results. Never let the model execute arbitrary code directly. 2. **Agents are loops** -- Every agent, from a simple weather bot to a complex coding assistant, follows the same loop: LLM decides -> system executes -> results feed back -> repeat. Complexity comes from the tools and state, not the loop itself. 3. **Tools are schemas** -- A tool definition is a JSON Schema that tells the model what function exists, what parameters it takes, and when to use it. Better descriptions produce better tool selection and argument quality. 4. **Errors are information** -- When a tool fails, return a structured error message to the model. The model can often recover by retrying with different arguments, choosing a different tool, or explaining the failure to the user. 5. **Defense in depth** -- LLM-generated arguments are untrusted input. Validate schemas, enforce types, limit argument ranges, sandbox execution, and require approval for dangerous operations.
**When to use tool calling:**
- The task requires real-world data the model doesn't have (weather, database, APIs)
- The task requires side effects (sending email, creating records, file operations)
- The task requires multi-step reasoning with intermediate data lookups
- The task requires computation the model can't do reliably (math, code execution)
**When NOT to use tool calling:**
- The model can answer from its training data alone
- You only need structured JSON output (use structured output features instead)
- The "tool" is just prompt engineering disguised as a function
- You want deterministic behavior (tool calling adds non-determinism from model decisions)
</philosophy>
---
<patterns>
Core Patterns
Pattern 1: Tool Definition Schema
Every tool definition has three parts: a name, a description, and a parameter schema. The description is the most important part -- it guides the model's decision to call the tool and how it constructs arguments.
// Provider-agnostic tool definition shape
interface T
Read more
name: ai-patterns-tool-use-patterns description: Provider-agnostic patterns for LLM function calling, tool loops, and agentic workflows
Tool Use Patterns
> **Quick Guide:** Tool use (function calling) lets LLMs invoke external functions. The universal pattern is: define tool schemas (JSON Schema for parameters) -> send tools + message to LLM -> detect tool_use in response -> execute locally -> return result to LLM -> repeat until the model responds with text. Guard every loop with a max-step limit, validate all tool inputs before execution, and return structured errors so the model can recover. Use tool choice control (`auto`, `required`, `none`, specific tool) to steer model behavior.
---
<critical_requirements>
CRITICAL: Before Using This Skill
> **All code must follow project conventions in CLAUDE.md** (kebab-case, named exports, import ordering, `import type`, named constants)
**(You MUST guard every tool loop with a maximum step limit -- unbounded loops risk infinite API calls and runaway costs)**
**(You MUST validate all tool input arguments before execution -- LLM-generated arguments are untrusted input)**
**(You MUST return structured error messages to the model when tool execution fails -- never silently swallow errors or return empty results)**
**(You MUST use JSON Schema for tool parameter definitions -- all major providers require this format)**
**(You MUST treat tool definitions as token cost -- every tool schema is sent on every API call, so keep descriptions concise but precise)**
</critical_requirements>
---
**Auto-detection:** tool use, function calling, tool_calls, tool_use, tool call loop, agent loop, tool definition, tool schema, toolChoice, tool_choice, parallel tool calls, human-in-the-loop, tool approval, agentic workflow, multi-step agent, tool result, tool error
**When to use:**
- Implementing LLM tool calling / function calling in any provider
- Building agent loops that call tools iteratively until a task is complete
- Handling parallel tool calls (multiple tools in one response)
- Reporting tool errors back to the model for recovery
- Controlling tool selection (auto, required, none, force specific)
- Adding human approval gates before dangerous tool execution
- Streaming responses that include tool calls
**Key patterns covered:**
- Tool definition schemas (JSON Schema for parameters, descriptions)
- The core tool call loop (send -> detect -> execute -> return -> re-send)
- Parallel tool calls (handling multiple calls in one response)
- Error handling (reporting tool failures back to the model)
- Tool choice control (auto, required, none, specific tool)
- Multi-step agent workflows with conversation state
- Human-in-the-loop approval patterns
- Type-safe tool definitions in TypeScript
- Security (input validation, sandboxing, least privilege)
- Streaming with tool calls
**When NOT to use:**
- Simple text generation without tool calling -- no tools needed
- Structured output / JSON extraction -- use your provider's structured output feature instead
- Provider-specific SDK patterns -- use your provider's SDK skill for SDK-specific APIs
**Detailed Resources:**
- [examples/core.md](examples/core.md) -- Tool definitions, the tool call loop, error handling, type-safe tools
- [examples/advanced.md](examples/advanced.md) -- Parallel tool calls, multi-step agents, human-in-the-loop, streaming, security
- [reference.md](reference.md) -- Decision frameworks, provider comparison, anti-pattern checklist
---
<philosophy>
Philosophy
Tool use is the mechanism that turns LLMs from text generators into agents. The model cannot execute code, query databases, or call APIs -- it can only _request_ that your code does so by emitting structured tool calls. Your code is the executor; the model is the planner.
**Core principles:**
1. **The model plans, you execute** -- The LLM emits tool call requests with structured arguments. Your code validates, executes, and returns results. Never let the model execute arbitrary code directly. 2. **Agents are loops** -- Every agent, from a simple weather bot to a complex coding assistant, follows the same loop: LLM decides -> system executes -> results feed back -> repeat. Complexity comes from the tools and state, not the loop itself. 3. **Tools are schemas** -- A tool definition is a JSON Schema that tells the model what function exists, what parameters it takes, and when to use it. Better descriptions produce better tool selection and argument quality. 4. **Errors are information** -- When a tool fails, return a structured error message to the model. The model can often recover by retrying with different arguments, choosing a different tool, or explaining the failure to the user. 5. **Defense in depth** -- LLM-generated arguments are untrusted input. Validate schemas, enforce types, limit argument ranges, sandbox execution, and require approval for dangerous operations.
**When to use tool calling:**
- The task requires real-world data the model doesn't have (weather, database, APIs)
- The task requires side effects (sending email, creating records, file operations)
- The task requires multi-step reasoning with intermediate data lookups
- The task requires computation the model can't do reliably (math, code execution)
**When NOT to use tool calling:**
- The model can answer from its training data alone
- You only need structured JSON output (use structured output features instead)
- The "tool" is just prompt engineering disguised as a function
- You want deterministic behavior (tool calling adds non-determinism from model decisions)
</philosophy>
---
<patterns>
Core Patterns
Pattern 1: Tool Definition Schema
Every tool definition has three parts: a name, a description, and a parameter schema. The description is the most important part -- it guides the model's decision to call the tool and how it constructs arguments.
// Provider-agnostic tool definition shape interface T
Showing the first part of this file.
The official skills marketplace for Agents Inc. 150+ skills covering everything from React and Prisma to Redis, ElevenLabs, and infrastructure tooling. Pick the skills that match your stack and install them via Claude Code. Need more control?
Repo: agents-inc/skills
Other skills on agents-inc-skills.
- /ai-infrastructure-huggingface-inference
Hugging Face Inference SDK patterns for TypeScript/Node.js — InferenceClient setup, chat completion, text generation, streaming, embeddings, image generation, audio transcription, translation, summarization, and Inference Endpoints
Open skill - /ai-infrastructure-litellm
LiteLLM proxy server setup, TypeScript client patterns via OpenAI SDK, model routing, fallbacks, load balancing, spend tracking, virtual keys, and production deployment
Open skill - /ai-infrastructure-modal
Serverless GPU compute platform for AI model deployment — web endpoints, GPU functions, model serving, and TypeScript client patterns
Open skill - /ai-infrastructure-ollama
Local LLM inference with the Ollama JavaScript client -- chat, streaming, tool calling, vision, embeddings, structured output, model management, and OpenAI-compatible endpoint
Open skill - /ai-infrastructure-replicate
Replicate SDK patterns for TypeScript/Node.js -- client setup, predictions, streaming, webhooks, file handling, model versioning, deployments, and training
Open skill - /ai-infrastructure-together-ai
Together AI SDK patterns for TypeScript — client setup, chat completions, streaming, structured output, function calling, embeddings, image generation, fine-tuning, and OpenAI-compatible endpoints
Open skill

